Spin/angular momentum question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Inquisiter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Inquisiter
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
For an electron in an arbitrary spin state, can an axis always be found along which the spin is 1/2 (as opposed to a superposition of 1/2 and -1/2 spins)? What about particles whose spin is 1 or greater? For example, for a spin 1 particle which is in an arbitrary spin state, can one always find an axis along which the spin is either 1 or 0. Or is it possible for a spin 1 particle to be in such a state that it's spin is a superposition of spin 1,0,-1 states along every axis? Moving on to angular momentum, if an electron in a hydrogen atom is in the n=2, l=1 state and in a superposition: a|1>+b|0>+c|-1> where |1>, |0>, |-1> are the eigenstates of L sub z, and a,b,c are arbitrary constants, can one always find an axis along which the angular momentum has a definite value (either 1, 0, or -1) and is not a superposition of states? (I assume that whatever is true for a spin 1 particle is also true for the n=2, l=1 state of the H atom).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the answer to all your questions is "yes". You can always find an axis where the spin (whatever it is) is an eigenstate along that axis, and not a superposition. Mathematically, the process of finding the axis is equivalent to changing the basis of the spin space.
 
Nope,what you're trying to describe is a collapse of an initially entagled state.According to the V-th postulate,the state after measurement will be an eigenstate of the measured observable.

We can't know s*** about a quantum system,before any measurement...

Daniel.

EDIT:I still think he was trying to describe disentanglement. :confused:
 
Dextercioby, my question had nothing to do with disentanglement and measurement.
EDIT: How do you know that I'm a "he"? Well, I am, but you couldn't have known that.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
716
Back
Top