Spin Orbit Interaction Hamiltonian

QMrocks
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Spin Orbit Interaction Hamiltonian is defined as follows:

<br /> H_{SO}=\frac{1}{2m_{e}c^2}\frac{1}{r} \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial r}\right)L\cdot S<br />

How does one derive the above Spin Orbit Interaction Hamiltonian from relativistic treatment? Is there a good textbook that elaborates on this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Messiah, Sakaurai, Cohen-Tannouji, Bjorken & Drell, all of those texts have the spin-orbit interaction defined in them and their derivations...
 
Dr Transport said:
Messiah, Sakaurai, Cohen-Tannouji, Bjorken & Drell, all of those texts have the spin-orbit interaction defined in them and their derivations...

Thank you!
 
Thomas precession

It might be worth mentioning that the "simple derivation" presented in most or perhaps all of those textbooks obtains a final result that is in error by approximately a factor of two. To get the right answer, it is important to carry out a relativistic analysis of what is often called the "Thomas precession" effect. This is addressed at some length in Jackson's textbook on E&M, in Chapter 11 or 12, I believe.
 
QMfunster said:
It might be worth mentioning that the "simple derivation" presented in most or perhaps all of those textbooks obtains a final result that is in error by approximately a factor of two. To get the right answer, it is important to carry out a relativistic analysis of what is often called the "Thomas precession" effect. This is addressed at some length in Jackson's textbook on E&M, in Chapter 11 or 12, I believe.

if we began from Dirac equation, we can obtain the Hamiltonian just like the form in Jackson book. i find L. I. Schiff's book extremely well explained.
 
Yes, I agree. Starting from relativistic quantum theory is definitely the most straightforward way to get to the correct result.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top