Spin states of the addition of 2 spin 1/2 particles

SimonRoberts
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

A QM question that I am stuck on:

Consider the addition of the spin of 2 electrons, s1=s2=½. Show
that there are one ms=1; two ms=0 and one ms=-1 states. Show the
4 spin states are given by:

a1a2
b1b2
(1/(sqrt(2)))(a1b2+b1a2)
(1/(sqrt(2)))(a1b2-b1a2)

I've used a and b in place of alpha and beta, which represent the spin up and spin down states.

I can see why there are one ms=1 and one ms=-1 states, and 2 ms=0 states, from adding the values of ms for individual particles, but am not sure on how to proceed to the second part.

Any nudge in the right direction would be great.

Cheers,

Simon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SimonRoberts said:
Hi everyone,

A QM question that I am stuck on:

Consider the addition of the spin of 2 electrons, s1=s2=½. Show
that there are one ms=1; two ms=0 and one ms=-1 states. Show the
4 spin states are given by:

a1a2
b1b2
(1/(sqrt(2)))(a1b2+b1a2)
(1/(sqrt(2)))(a1b2-b1a2)

I've used a and b in place of alpha and beta, which represent the spin up and spin down states.

I can see why there are one ms=1 and one ms=-1 states, and 2 ms=0 states, from adding the values of ms for individual particles, but am not sure on how to proceed to the second part.

Any nudge in the right direction would be great.

Cheers,

Simon.

Check out this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=376142"

and the one referred to in it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SimonRoberts said:
I can see why there are one ms=1 and one ms=-1 states, and 2 ms=0 states, from adding the values of ms for individual particles, but am not sure on how to proceed to the second part.
That is because you are not given enough information. Any linear combination of the last two states is a state with ms=0.

Now, it happens that the first state has s=1 and the second state has s=0, and that is why these two particular linear combinations of ms=0 states are important. But the question does say anything about the value of s.
 
Cheers for the help.


The next part says:

Indicate which values of S and ms correspond to each of the 4 states.

So far what I've done is substituted the spin up (1 0 ) (<< vertically! don't know how to format that on here!) and spin down (0 1) into the states it says I am looking for .

e.g, (1/sqrt2)*(1 -1)

hmmm...
 
This area is very small to present these big issues. As you search on this topic you will go in deep. Online is best help for you. There you will find several e-books to solve your problems.
 
For the states aa and bb it should be clear that they can only belong to s=1. As they form a irreducible representation of the rotation group, the third state with s=1 should be obtainable from any of the two by applying a suitable rotation. How does a single spin transform under a rotation of 90 degrees? How does the product aa transform under the rotation?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top