Splitting up an interval of integration

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around proving the relation for splitting an interval of integration, specifically the equation \(\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx= \int_{a}^{c}f(x)dx + \int_{c}^{b}f(x)dx\). Participants explore the use of Riemann sums and piecewise functions to establish this relationship, delving into the theoretical underpinnings of definite integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially attempts to prove the relation using Riemann sums but expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their approach.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial uncertainty and points out that the Riemann sums are not equivalent due to being taken over different intervals.
  • A suggestion is made to define two piecewise functions, \(h(x)\) and \(k(x)\), to facilitate the proof, indicating that \(f(x)\) can be expressed as the sum of these functions over their respective intervals.
  • A later reply confirms the correctness of the reformulated proof using the piecewise functions, stating that contributions outside the defined intervals do not affect the integral.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of using piecewise functions for the proof, but there is initial disagreement regarding the approach using Riemann sums. The discussion reflects a refinement of understanding rather than a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve all potential assumptions regarding the continuity or properties of the function \(f(x)\) over the intervals in question.

"Don't panic!"
Messages
600
Reaction score
8
How does one prove the following relation?

\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx= \int_{a}^{c}f(x)dx + \int_{c}^{b}f(x)dx

Initially, I attempted to do this by writing the definite integral as the limit of a Riemann sum, i.e.

\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx= \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{(b-a)}{n}\sum_{k=1}^{n}f(x^{\ast}_{k})

Where x^{\ast}_{k}\in\left[x_{k}, x_{k+1} \right].

Then,

\int_{a}^{c}f(x)dx + \int_{c}^{b}f(x)dx= \\ = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{(c-a)}{n}\sum_{k=1}^{n}f(x^{\ast}_{k}) +\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{(b-c)}{n}\sum_{k=1}^{n}f(x^{\ast}_{k}) \\ = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{(c-a)+ (b-c)}{n}\sum_{k=1}^{n}f(x^{\ast}_{k}) \\ = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{(b-a)}{n}\sum_{k=1}^{n}f(x^{\ast}_{k} = \int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx

But I have a feeling that this isn't correct?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your feeling is correct!
The two Riemann sums are not the same because they're taken in different intervals and so, in general, the terms aren't equal and so you can't factor them!
Consider two functions h(x) and k(x) defined as:
<br /> h(x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{cc} f(x) \ \ \ \ x \in (a,c) \\ 0 \ \ \ \ otherwise \end{array} \right.<br />
and
<br /> k(x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{cc} f(x) \ \ \ \ x \in [c,b) \\ 0 \ \ \ \ otherwise \end{array} \right.<br />.
Its obvious that f(x)=h(x)+k(x) when x \in (a,b). Use this for the proof!
 
Last edited:
Ah, ok. thanks for your help.

Would this be correct then?

\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx = \int_{a}^{b}\left(h(x)+k(x)\right)dx = \\ = \int_{a}^{b}h(x)dx +\int_{a}^{b}k(x)dx = \int_{a}^{c}h(x)dx +\int_{c}^{b}k(x)dx = \int_{a}^{c}f(x)dx +\int_{c}^{b}f(x)dx

As h(x) is zero outside the interval (a,c) and so will provide no further contributions after this point in the integral, and similarly for k(x).
 
Yes, that's it!
 
Last edited:
Ok, cool. Thanks very much for your help with this, much appreciated!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K