Spontaneous Process and Irreversibility

AI Thread Summary
In isolated systems, the change in heat (dQ) is zero, leading to the conclusion that the difference in entropy (Sb - Sa) is always greater than or equal to zero, indicating spontaneity. However, it is clarified that while every spontaneous process is irreversible, not all irreversible processes are spontaneous. Irreversible processes often involve energy loss through mechanisms like friction and viscosity, which do not necessarily align with natural spontaneity. An example given is the act of rubbing a stone against a wall, which is irreversible but not spontaneous. Understanding these distinctions is crucial in thermodynamics.
Euphemia
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,all
My problem is following this picture!
http://mykomica.org/boards/shieiuping/physics/src/1325318780058.jpg
If the system is isolated, dQ is always zero. Sb-Sa ≥0
And it satisfies the requirement of spontaneousness in isolated systems.
So ,I do wonder if irreversible process is always spontaneous!
Am I Right?
Euphemia
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Note: Your picture isn't coming across.

You have it backwards. Every spontaneous process is irreversible, but not every irreversible process is spontaneous.
 
A process which is irreversible is the one results in energy loss in the form of heat (dissipation) due to friction ,viscosity etc.As these are involved in processes other than natural ones- eg.,rubbing a stone againast a wall in vertically upward direction- irreversible processes need not be natural or spontaneous ones.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Back
Top