What is the formula for calculating force using a spring balance?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating force using a spring balance in a physics context. Participants emphasize the importance of analyzing forces acting on each mass and drawing free body diagrams to understand the system's dynamics. The tension in the strings connected to the spring balance is critical, and assumptions about static conditions should be avoided. A key formula derived is force = 2m1m2/(m1+m2), which relates to how the spring balance measures tension. The conversation concludes with clarity on the relationship between tension and the forces involved in the system.
Suyash Singh
Messages
168
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


upload_2018-4-14_9-57-39.png


Homework Equations


only basic school level physics will be needed in this question.

The Attempt at a Solution


The mass m1 pulls spring from first side and m2 pulls spring from the other side therefore reading should be m1-m2.
But my answer is wrong.
I can't understand what to do.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-14_9-57-39.png
    upload_2018-4-14_9-57-39.png
    9.2 KB · Views: 5,251
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with the forces acting on each object. Draw the free body diagrams. Also think about what happens if a spring is hung from the ceiling and a mass m is hanging from the spring. what are all the forces on the spring?
 
As Chandra posted, draw a free body diagram for each suspended mass.
Think about the tensions in the strings. Are they the same? If not, why not?
Is the system static?
 
upload_2018-4-14_20-29-13.png
tension in both strings connected is (m1-m2)g. :(
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-14_20-29-13.png
    upload_2018-4-14_20-29-13.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 3,090
Suyash Singh said:
View attachment 224049 tension in both strings connected is (m1-m2)g. :(
for second body diagram(m2) we replace all 1 with 2 and vice versa
 
Why are you stating that the upward force on m1 is m2g?
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
Why are you stating that the upward force on m1 is m2g?
because the other mass is pulling it up
 
So, is there no difference between this problem and another, in which there is no spring at all, but a single string going from m1 to m2 over the two pulleys?
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
So, is there no difference between this problem and another, in which there is no spring at all, but a single string going from m1 to m2 over the two pulleys?
ummm i don't know.We never have practicals.
supposing the spring balance canceled out the m1g force.
tension = m1g ( for string connected to m1)
 
  • #10
Well, it is a simpler problem than the one you started. If you like, you can draw the diagram for that problem, and you will see the point that I am trying to make. That is, we cannot jump to conclusions from every formula that we have on hand. In your situation, you drew the force diagram for only one object. What about the force diagram for the spring?
 
  • #11
You forgot to answer this question:

haruspex said:
Is the system static?
 
  • #12
Suyash Singh said:
tension in both strings connected is (m1-m2)g. :(
You do not know that yet. Just assign unknowns to the two string tensions, and do not assume the system is static.
Post at least one standard physics equation which you believe may be relevant.
Consider the three bodies separately, and apply that equation to each.
 
  • #13
upload_2018-4-15_9-29-43.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-15_9-29-26.png
    upload_2018-4-15_9-29-26.png
    4.4 KB · Views: 687
  • upload_2018-4-15_9-29-43.png
    upload_2018-4-15_9-29-43.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 1,974
  • #14
haruspex said:
You do not know that yet. Just assign unknowns to the two string tensions, and do not assume the system is static.
Post at least one standard physics equation which you believe may be relevant.
Consider the three bodies separately, and apply that equation to each.
T2=m2g
T1=m1g
spring balance strings have no tension because they are perpendicular
 
  • #15
Suyash Singh said:
T2=m2g
T1=m1g
No. For the third time, do not assume the system is static.
 
  • #16
Suyash Singh said:
spring balance strings have no tension because they are perpendicular
Strings have this clever trick of carrying tension around corners and over pulleys.
 
  • Like
Likes Suyash Singh
  • #17
haruspex said:
No. For the third time, do not assume the system is static.
t1<m1g
t2<m2g
 
  • #18
haruspex said:
No. For the third time, do not assume the system is static.
oh i just saw photo of spring balance
is it like that the weight of only one mass is being measured and the other mass is to hold the spring balance?
 
  • #19
Suyash Singh said:
oh i just saw photo of spring balance
is it like that the weight of only one mass is being measured and the other mass is to hold the spring balance?
if its so then,
acceleration of spring balance=a=(m1-m2)g/m2
 
  • #20
oh and if both masses were equal

both mass=m
then reading of spring balance would be m
 
  • #21
Suyash Singh said:
is it like that the weight of only one mass is being measured and the other mass is to hold the spring balance?
No.
Suyash Singh said:
acceleration of spring balance=a=(m1-m2)g/m2
The spring balance we are told is massless, and we can assume that its reading is constant. So its only functions in the question are to connect the two strings and to measure the tension in them. So apart from the measurement you can ignore the balance and treat the two strings as one.
Let the tension in that one string be T. Write two motion equations, one for each mass.
 
  • Like
Likes Suyash Singh
  • #22
haruspex said:
No.

The spring balance we are told is massless, and we can assume that its reading is constant. So its only functions in the question are to connect the two strings and to measure the tension in them. So apart from the measurement you can ignore the balance and treat the two strings as one.
Let the tension in that one string be T. Write two motion equations, one for each mass.
ok let acceleration of system be a(downwards of m1)

T=M2(g+a)+m1(g-a)
T=m2g+m2a+m1g-m1a
=g(m2+m1)+a(m2-m1)
 
  • #23
Suyash Singh said:
T=M2(g+a)+m1(g-a)
If two teams pull on a rope in a tug of war, each exerting 1000N of force, what is the tension in the rope?
 
  • #24
Suyash Singh said:
T=M2(g+a)+m1(g-a)
What standard equation are you using to get that, and to what free body are you applying it?
 
  • #25
jbriggs444 said:
If two teams pull on a rope in a tug of war, each exerting 1000N of force, what is the tension in the rope?
1000N because they won't cancel out.
 
  • #26
haruspex said:
What standard equation are you using to get that, and to what free body are you applying it?
i am applying it to both the masses

g is downward acceleration due to Earth
a is the acceleration produced in the system due to m1>m2.
a for m2 is in the upward direction
a for m1 is in the downward direction
 
  • #27
Suyash Singh said:
1000N because they won't cancel out.
Right. So why do you think that the forces add in the situation for this problem?
 
  • #28
Suyash Singh said:
i am applying it to both the masses
I asked what standard equation you are using. Please state it.
Apply it to one free body at a time. I don't understand how you are applying it to both at once, but the equation you get is wrong.
 
  • #29
haruspex said:
I asked what standard equation you are using. Please state it.
Apply it to one free body at a time. I don't understand how you are applying it to both at once, but the equation you get is wrong.
standard equation:
Force= mass x acceleration
Tension = force
Applying on m2
force=m2(g+a)
Applying on m1
force=m1(g-a)

where net acceleration is in the downward direction of m1 since m1>m2

now i am confused with tension.
 
  • #30
jbriggs444 said:
Right. So why do you think that the forces add in the situation for this problem?
i don't know the math here but in this case one of the force acts as a "support" ,that is, we could replace one of the force with a wall.

what i mean to say is that two teams pulling rope from two sides with same force
is the same case as
a team pulling a rope attached to a stationary wall with the same force.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
864
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
961
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K