Spring diameter change under pressure

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the compression of a spring and the resulting change in its outer diameter. Participants explore the theoretical and mathematical aspects of how the spring's shape and dimensions change under applied force, focusing on the connection between the compression length and the outer diameter.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the outer diameter of the spring may change in a parabolic shape when compressed, while others propose it could be more uniform.
  • One participant references a formula for diameter change but expresses confusion about its derivation and relevance to the compression length.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of the developed length of wire in a helix and discusses how it remains constant during compression.
  • Several participants attempt to derive relationships between the spring's dimensions, including axial length, wire diameter, and the number of turns.
  • There is a discussion about the parameters involved in the equations, with requests for visual aids to clarify the dimensions and relationships.
  • One participant mentions the superficial strains in the axial and radial directions and their relationship to the helix angle.
  • Another participant expresses difficulty in following the mathematical derivations and seeks clarification on specific terms and equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact relationship between compression length and outer diameter. Multiple competing views and interpretations of the equations and concepts remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding specific parameters and derivations, indicating that some assumptions may not be fully articulated. The discussion also reveals a dependence on visual representations to clarify complex relationships.

dislect
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I have a question and I would love some guidance or external reference for relevant information.

I have a normal compression spring (see attached pic - 1), I apply a force to compress it by x length.
I want to create a formula connecting between the small increase of the outer diameter of the spring and the length x.

spring.png


1. Would the shape of the spring look like in pic - 2 by a good approximation or more similar to pic - 3, meaning the outer diameter is not the same throughout the length of the spring when compressed and is of a parabolic shape?
2. Help figuring out how to connect between x and the new Douter?

Thanks a lot guys,

Have a good day
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the end diameters were not constrained laterally, it would be like in Figure 2. Look up the equation for a helix. The constraint is that the developed length of wire in the helix is unchanged when you compress.

Chet
 
Hi Chestermiller,
I'm sorry but I don't follow. What do you mean equation for a helix?
What is "the developed length of wire" - The total length of the wire if I was to straighten it?

I came across this info of the diameter change (http://springipedia.com/compression-general-design.asp) with the formula:
O.D.expension= sqr root (D^2+ d + (p^2-d^2/(Pi^2))-OD
DESIGN HANDBOOK Engineering Guide To Spring Design, 1987 Edition, Page 31, Associated Spring - Barnes Group Inc

But I really want to know how it was developed, plus it has nothing to do with the compression length I called x
 
Last edited:
dislect said:
Hi Chestermiller,
I'm sorry but I don't follow. What do you mean equation for a helix?
What is "the developed length of wire" - The total length of the wire if I was to straighten it?

I came across this info of the diameter change (http://springipedia.com/compression-general-design.asp) with the formula:
O.D.expension= sqr root (D^2+ d + (p^2-d^2/(Pi^2))-OD
DESIGN HANDBOOK Engineering Guide To Spring Design, 1987 Edition, Page 31, Associated Spring - Barnes Group Inc

But I really want to know how it was developed, plus it has nothing to do with the compression length I called x
I don't really know what the parameters in the above equation are. If I were writing the equation for a helix, I would write something like the parametric equations

r = Helix radius = const.
θ = θ(s)
z = z(s)

where s is the developed length along the helix. If [itex]\phi[/itex] is the helix angle (which is constant), then

[tex]\theta=\frac{s}{r}\cos \phi[/tex]
[tex]z=s\sin \phi[/tex]

If you stretch the spring, z gets longer, while the total developed length s and the total number of turns (as characterized by the the total spiral angle θ) is held constant. So how does r change as a function of z, holding θ and s constant?

Your are correct that the developed length s is the total length of the wire if you straightened it.
 
Hi thanks for the reply!
I would say that just playing with equations gives me r=[itex]\frac{z}{θ*tan∅}[/itex]

But I'm not sure I understand what θ and ∅ stands for, can you refer me to a sketch showing the dimensions? I want to translate these to typical spring dimensions such as number of coils, pitch and so on.
 
Consider a spring of n turns, axial length y and wire mid-diameter x = (ID + OD) / 2.
Initially axial length is yi and mid-diameter = xi
The wire length per turn is Sqrt( ( Pi * xi )^2 + (yi / n)^2 )
The spring length y will control the mid-diameter x.

Sqrt( ( Pi * x )^2 + (y / n)^2 ) = Sqrt( ( Pi * xi )^2 + (yi / n)^2 )
( Pi * x )^2 = ( Pi * xi )^2 + (yi / n)^2 – (y / n)^2
Pi * x = Sqrt( ( Pi * xi )^2 + (yi / n)^2 – (y / n)^2 )

Therefore x = Sqrt( ( Pi * xi )^2 + (yi / n)^2 – (y / n)^2 ) / Pi
 
Hi Baluncore, thank you for the rapid reply.
Again, I'm struggling understanding the dimensions (axial length yi? xi?)
Could you please take a random spring jpeg and mark the dimensions?

thanks a lot and sorry for the trouble
 
dislect said:
Hi thanks for the reply!
I would say that just playing with equations gives me r=[itex]\frac{z}{θ*tan∅}[/itex]

But I'm not sure I understand what θ and ∅ stands for, can you refer me to a sketch showing the dimensions? I want to translate these to typical spring dimensions such as number of coils, pitch and so on.

θ is 2π times the number of turns.
tan(phi) is the pitch divided by 2πr

In the analysis I did, I was just following the centerline of the coil, which, for a wire diameter that is small compared to the spring diameter, is adequate. If you take the equations that I gave you and integrate, you get simply

[tex]z^2+(r\theta)^2=z_0^2+(r_0\theta)^2=s^2[/tex]

where z is the total length of the spring, and r is the radius of the spring. So, if we differentiate, we obtain:

z0dz+θ2r0dr=0
The superficial strains in the axial and radial directions, respectively are
εz=dz/z0
εr=dr/r0

So, [tex]z_0^2\epsilon_z+\theta^2r_0^2\epsilon_r=0[/tex]

So, using the relationships I presented in a previous post, we obtain:

[tex]\epsilon_r=-\tan^2\phi\epsilon_z[/tex]
where [itex]\phi[/itex] is the helix angle of the spring.
 
Last edited:
dislect said:
Hi Baluncore, thank you for the rapid reply.
Again, I'm struggling understanding the dimensions (axial length yi? xi?)
Could you please take a random spring jpeg and mark the dimensions?
See attached.
Also;
OD = outside diameter of coil spring
ID = inside diameter of coil spring
For a wire diameter d, we then get
OD = x + d and
ID = x – d.
 

Attachments

  • spring.jpg
    spring.jpg
    11.1 KB · Views: 831
  • #10
I made some changes in my post #8 to correct an error, and to complete the analysis. It shows that the superficial strain in the radial direction is equal to minus the superficial strain in the axial direction time the tangent square of the initial helix angle.

Chet
 
  • #11
Hi Baluncore, Thank you for the pic!
So you say that the wire length on a single turn is equal when the spring is compressed and when it is free, right?
How did you come by the equation Sqrt( ( Pi * xi )^2 + (yi / n)^2 ) ?


Chestermiller, It was kind of hard for me to follow once you got to differentiating. I understood what you've done up to that point.
 
  • #12
dislect said:
Chestermiller, It was kind of hard for me to follow once you got to differentiating. I understood what you've done up to that point.

Check out the equation I wrote for s^2 in post #8. That tells it all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #13
dislect said:
How did you come by the equation
The flattened surface of the cylinder that contains one turn of the spring is a rectangle.
It has a width that is the circumference of the cylinder, = Pi * x.
It has a length of one turn which is the spring pitch, = yi / n.
The wire runs diagonally across that surface.
Pythagoras said the length of the diagonal was the root of the sum of the squares.
Hence length of one turn of the relaxed spring is; = Sqrt( ( Pi * xi )^2 + (yi / n)^2 )
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #14
Baluncore I can't quite imagine it from the view you're talking about.
I understand the length but not the width.
Are you seeing this as something like this?
If so i don't understand why pi*xi and not xi

image.png
 
  • #15
A helix defines a cylinder that has a diameter and a circumference = Pi * diameter.
One turn of the wire spring advances yi/n.
The circumference of the helix is Pi*xi.
The length of one turn of the wire is Sqrt( ( yi/n)^2 + ( Pi*xi)^2)
If you compress the spring from axial length yi to y without changing n or the wire length then;
Sqrt( ( y/n)^2 + ( Pi*x)^2) = Sqrt( ( yi/n)^2 + ( Pi*xi)^2)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K