Spring Force and Acceleration with Friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a spring with a force constant of 3.85 N/m compressed between two blocks of different masses (0.250 kg and 0.500 kg) on a horizontal surface. The problem requires determining the acceleration of each block when the spring is released, considering different coefficients of kinetic friction (0, 0.100, and 0.462).

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between spring force and acceleration using Newton's second law, questioning the correct distance to use for spring compression. Some participants attempt to incorporate friction into their calculations, while others express uncertainty about their approach.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct application of forces, particularly regarding the direction of forces acting on each block. There is ongoing exploration of how to account for friction in the calculations, with various interpretations of the problem being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using the correct compression distance of the spring and the varying coefficients of friction, which may affect the blocks' ability to move. There is also mention of the possibility that the friction force could exceed the spring force in certain cases, leading to no movement.

Adrianw2
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A light spring with force constant 3.85 N/m is compressed by 8.00 cm as it is held between a 0.250-kg block on the left and a 0.500-kg block on the right, both resting on a horizontal surface. The spring exerts a force on each block, tending to push them apart. The blocks are simultaneously released from rest. Find the acceleration with which each block starts to move, given that the coefficient of kinetic friction between each block and the surface is (a) 0, (b) 0.100, and (c) 0.462

Homework Equations



Fx = -kx
F = ma
W = the integral of Fxdx from initial to final position
W = FΔR
Ffriction = umg

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's my attempt so far, but I don't think it's right.

Since Fx = -kx and F = ma then ma=-kx and -kx/m = a
So for the first block (-3.85N/m)(0.04m)/(0.250kg) = 1.232 m/s2
And for the second block (-3/85N/m)(0.04m)/(0.500kg) = 0.616 m/s2

I chose 0.04 m, because that is the amount the spring is being compressed on each side, maybe I am supposed to use 0.08 m in the equation anyways though.

For the cases with friction I believe I would have to subtract the force of friction in the F = ma and somehow put it in the equations I used in part b and c.

Anyway, I don't even know if I started the question correctly, but any help would be awesome.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Adrianw2 said:

Homework Statement



A light spring with force constant 3.85 N/m is compressed by 8.00 cm as it is held between a 0.250-kg block on the left and a 0.500-kg block on the right, both resting on a horizontal surface. The spring exerts a force on each block, tending to push them apart. The blocks are simultaneously released from rest. Find the acceleration with which each block starts to move, given that the coefficient of kinetic friction between each block and the surface is (a) 0, (b) 0.100, and (c) 0.462

Homework Equations



Fx = -kx
F = ma
W = the integral of Fxdx from initial to final position
W = FΔR
Ffriction = umg

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's my attempt so far, but I don't think it's right.

Since Fx = -kx and F = ma then ma=-kx and -kx/m = a
So for the first block (-3.85N/m)(0.04m)/(0.250kg) = 1.232 m/s2
And for the second block (-3/85N/m)(0.04m)/(0.500kg) = 0.616 m/s2

I chose 0.04 m, because that is the amount the spring is being compressed on each side, maybe I am supposed to use 0.08 m in the equation anyways though.

For the cases with friction I believe I would have to subtract the force of friction in the F = ma and somehow put it in the equations I used in part b and c.

Anyway, I don't even know if I started the question correctly, but any help would be awesome.

Thanks
Good start, but you used the wrong delta x, and you've got to watch your direction of the acceleration for each block. The spring is compressed 8 cm, and that is the distance you must use in calculating the spring force, which is the same on each block. For part b, yes, use Newton 2 after identifying the value and direction of the spring and friction forces.
 
So this would be the correct answer for the first part then?

Since Fx = -kx and F = ma then ma=-kx and -kx/m = a
So for the first block (-3.85N/m)(0.08m)/(0.250kg) = -1.232 m/s2
And for the second block (-3.85N/m)(-0.08m)/(0.500kg) = 0.616 m/s2

I had actually calculated both of the accelerations with the 0.08m last time, but I included the proper directions this time.

And for part b would it look something like this?

Fx = -kx and F = ma +/- umg then ma = -kx +/- umg and a = [(-kx)/m] +/- ug
The reason I have +/- umg is because friction is acting in a different direction in both cases
So for the first block [-1.232m/s2] + [(0.100)(9.81m/s2)] = -0.251m/s2
And for the second block [0.616m/s2] - [(0.100)(9.81 m/s2) = -0.365m/s2

I don't think I have the part b right now that I look at it, if somebody could tell me where I went wrong that would help a lot.

Thanks again
 
I think that for part b and c if you just see for the magnitudes then the following would be right.

[tex]kx - \mu}mg = ma[/tex]
 
Part a looks good. In part b, the acceleration is not the same as in part a, so don't use it. For the left block, you've fot the spring force acting left and the friction force acting right. Use Newton's law. Careful using the different friction coefficients that are given. In some cases, Newton 1 may apply.
 
FedEx said:
I think that for part b and c if you just see for the magnitudes then the following would be right.

[tex]kx - \mu}mg = ma[/tex]


When I do that I get the same numbers as above and that doesn't make sense, especially with friction because the larger block has a higher acceleration, could you possibly try out your way with the numbers so I can see if I actually understand what you're saying?
 
PhanthomJay said:
Part a looks good. In part b, the acceleration is not the same as in part a, so don't use it. For the left block, you've fot the spring force acting left and the friction force acting right. Use Newton's law. Careful using the different friction coefficients that are given. In some cases, Newton 1 may apply.

So it will be net force divided by the mass to get acceleration

First block: -(kx - umg)/m = a = [(-3.85N/m)(0.08m)+(0.100)(0.250kg)(9.81m/s2)]/0.250kg = -.0251m/s2

Second block [(-3.85N/m)(0.08m)-(0.100(0.250kg)(9.81m/s2)]/0.500kg = a negative number indicating that the friction force is too high and the block won't move?
 
Just apply

[tex]kx - \mu}mg = ma[/tex]

And that would be the answers.:smile:
 
FedEx said:
Just apply

[tex]kx - \mu}mg = ma[/tex]

And that would be the answers.:smile:

When I do that I obtain the same answers I got in the post above, so I assume they were right. And for part c I get answers that suggest both blocks aren't moved when the coefficient of friction is that strong.
 
  • #10
Adrianw2 said:
When I do that I obtain the same answers I got in the post above, so I assume they were right. And for part c I get answers that suggest both blocks aren't moved when the coefficient of friction is that strong.


So for part c are you getting zero for a.
 
  • #11
FedEx said:
So for part c are you getting zero for a.

Well, I'm getting answers where the force of friction is greater than kx meaning the blocks won't be able to go anywhere.

Thanks a bunch for all the help, I think I've got it all now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K