I Squaring a Sum of Ket-Bra Operators

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter jstrunk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Sum
jstrunk
Messages
53
Reaction score
2
I can't follow the solution given in my textbook to the following problem.
The solution goes right off the rails on the first step.

Consider a system whose Hamiltonian is given by
<br /> \hat H = \alpha \left( {\left. {\left| {{\phi _1}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _2}} \right|} \right. + \left. {\left| {{\phi _2}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _1}} \right|} \right.} \right)<br />,
where \alpha is real and \left. {\left| {{\phi _1}} \right.} \right\rangle ,\left. {\left| {{\phi _2}} \right.} \right\rangle are normalized eigenstates of an operator {\hat A} that has no degenerate eigenvalues.
Find {{\hat H}^2}.

My first step is {{\hat H}^2} = {\alpha ^2}\left( {\left. {\left| {{\phi _1}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _2}} \right|} \right. + \left. {\left| {{\phi _2}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _1}} \right|} \right.} \right)\left( {\left. {\left| {{\phi _1}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _2}} \right|} \right. + \left. {\left| {{\phi _2}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _1}} \right|} \right.} \right).
The first step in the book is {{\hat H}^2} = {\alpha ^2}\left( {\left. {\left| {{\phi _1}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _2}} \right|} \right. + \left. {\left| {{\phi _2}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _1}} \right|} \right.} \right)\left( {\left. {\left| {{\phi _1}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _1}} \right|} \right. + \left. {\left| {{\phi _2}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _2}} \right|} \right.} \right).
I have no idea how they got that second term. The solution gives the following justification. I understand each of the points given in the justification, but as far as I can see the do nothing to justify the conclusion.
Since \left. {\left| {{\phi _1}} \right.} \right\rangle and \left. {\left| {{\phi _2}} \right.} \right\rangle are eigenstates of {\hat A} and {\hat A} is Hermitian,
they must be orthogonal. Since \left. {\left| {{\phi _1}} \right.} \right\rangle and \left. {\left| {{\phi _2}} \right.} \right\rangle are both
normalized and since \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _1}} \right|} \right.\left. {{\phi _2}} \right\rangle = 0, we can reduce {{\hat H}^2} to
{{\hat H}^2} = {\alpha ^2}\left( {\left. {\left| {{\phi _1}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _2}} \right|} \right. + \left. {\left| {{\phi _2}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _1}} \right|} \right.} \right)\left( {\left. {\left| {{\phi _1}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _1}} \right|} \right. + \left. {\left| {{\phi _2}} \right.} \right\rangle \left\langle {\left. {{\phi _2}} \right|} \right.} \right)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that for operators, ##(A+B)^2 = A^2 + AB +BA +B^2## which is not necessarily the same as ##A^2 + 2AB + B^2## because ##A## and ##B## don't have to commute. Also, you can add a term like ##\left|\right.\phi_1 \left.\right>\left<\right.\phi_2 |\phi_1 \left.\right>\left<\right.\phi_2 \left.\right|## to any sum without changing the sum because the two vectors are orthogonal.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
514
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
425
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top