SR: Finding the speed of particles wrt the laboratory

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in special relativity involving two particles in a high-energy accelerator experiment approaching each other with a specified relative speed. Participants are tasked with determining the speed of each particle as measured in the laboratory frame, given the relative speed of 0.890c.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of relative velocity and how it applies to the laboratory frame. Some express confusion regarding the calculations leading to the speed of 0.611c and question the reasoning behind using different equations for velocity. Others explore the implications of the reference frame in which one particle is at rest.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and insights. Some have made progress in their calculations, while others are questioning the assumptions and definitions related to relative speed. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in the problem, and various interpretations are being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion regarding the definitions of relative speed and the reference frames involved. There is also mention of advanced concepts that may exceed introductory physics, indicating a range of understanding among participants.

rugerts
Messages
153
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


Two particles in a high-energy accelerator experiment approach each other head-on with a relative speed of 0.890c. Both particles travel at the same speed as measured in the laboratory. What is the speed of each particle, as measured in the laboratory?

Homework Equations


upload_2019-3-22_15-1-21.png
for
upload_2019-3-22_15-1-49.png


The Attempt at a Solution


IMG-1969.JPG

I've interpreted the relative velocity between the two as 0.890c and the velocity of, say particle 2, to be -v wrt laboratory S and -v wrt S'. The answer appears to be 0.611c which is way off from what I've got.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-3-22_15-1-21.png
    upload_2019-3-22_15-1-21.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 769
  • upload_2019-3-22_15-1-49.png
    upload_2019-3-22_15-1-49.png
    3 KB · Views: 789
  • IMG-1969.JPG
    IMG-1969.JPG
    26.6 KB · Views: 874
Physics news on Phys.org
After another try, I've made some progress, but it still doesn't seem to be yielding the correct answer. Can anyone offer any helpful hints for my new work shown below:
IMG-1970.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG-1970.JPG
    IMG-1970.JPG
    36.5 KB · Views: 808
So it seems as though using the equation for v prime gives the correct result, 0.611c. Not sure why this is so. My work is shown below... (After the last step shown, I plugged into a Computer Algebra System)
IMG-1971.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG-1971.JPG
    IMG-1971.JPG
    39.4 KB · Views: 723
The key here is what the "relative" speed of the two particles means in this problem. After realizing that it is the speed of one particle in the system of reference where the other one is at rest, everything else is straightforward. This system is one which moves at the same speed as one of the particles (for instance, particle 1). Then using the first equation for the motion of the second particle with respect to this system, ##v_x'=-0.89c##, ##u=v##, and ##v_x=-v##.
 
quinoa19 said:
The key here is what the "relative" speed of the two particles means in this problem. After realizing that it is the speed of one particle in the system of reference where the other one is at rest, everything else is straightforward. This system is one which moves at the same speed as one of the particles (for instance, particle 1). Then using the first equation for the motion of the second particle with respect to this system, ##v_x'=-0.89c##, ##u=v##, and ##v_x=-v##.
Fair enough. How about using the other equation where the variable solved for is not v' but instead v. Then, rearranging to get v' (this is as opposed to using the equation where v' is the variable solved for). Why doesn't it work both ways?
 
Rearranging the second equation and solving for v' will produce the first equation
 
Side comment [possibly too advanced for introductory physics... but really shouldn't be]

There is a geometric analogy that can be exploited in this problem.
The relative velocity $$v_{BA}=\tanh(\theta_B-\theta_A)\qquad v_{BA}=0.89,$$
where (\theta_B-\theta_A) is the relative Minkowski-angle [called rapidity] between the particles' 4-velocities.

The frame which observes both particles with the same speed in opposite directions is the center of mass frame (technically, center of momentum frame) [assuming they have equal masses]. Call this frame O. The 4-velocity of this frame is along the Minkowski-angle bisector. In that frame, A and B have speed
$$v_{BO}=\tanh(\theta_B-\theta_O)=\tanh\left(\frac{\theta_B-\theta_A}{2}\right)=\tanh\left({\rm arctanh}(0.89)\right)$$
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=tanh(atanh(0.890)/2) gives 0.61128

(Your first equation, the relative-velocity formula, is actually an identity for the hyperbolic-tangent of a difference of angles:
\begin{align*}
\tanh(\theta_B-\theta_A)&=\frac{\tanh\theta_B-\tanh\theta_A}{1-\tanh\theta_B\tanh\theta_A}\\
\tanh((\theta_B-\theta_O)-(\theta_A-\theta_O))&=\frac{\tanh(\theta_B-\theta_O)-\tanh(\theta_A-\theta_O)}{1-\tanh(\theta_B-\theta_O)\tanh(\theta_A-\theta_O)}\\
\end{align*}
.)

For fancier approaches: see my Insight https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativity-variables-velocity-doppler-bondi-k-rapidity/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K