Stability of a spring mass system in two dimensions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the stability of a spring mass system in two dimensions, focusing on the potential energy expressions derived from the configuration of the springs and the mass. Participants are analyzing the mathematical relationships and implications of the potential energy in the context of equilibrium conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive potential energy expressions and explore their implications for equilibrium. Questions arise regarding the simplification of these expressions and the conditions under which derivatives yield solutions. There is also discussion about the treatment of constants in the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their expressions for potential energy and questioning the validity of their approaches. Some have provided insights into approximations used in their calculations, while others seek clarification on the treatment of constants and the implications of their results.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the constants involved in the potential energy equations, as well as the assumptions made in the derivations. Participants are navigating these complexities without a clear consensus on the next steps or resolutions.

kyva1929
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Attached

Homework Equations



5.104 mentioned in the problem is

Also attached

The Attempt at a Solution



Suppose the mass is moved to (x,y), the distance from the mass to the left spring is denoted by A, the distance from the mass to the right spring is denoted by B. I get the expression in the last line.

If I expand the whole expression, and treat sqrt((a+/-x)^2+y^2) as simply a (for small x and y, << a), I can obtain the potential energy in the form of 5.104 after eliminating certain constants, however, that doesn't help me in solving the eqm part of the question.

Differentiating the expression with respect to x doesn't give a solution when the first derivative = 0, which would then indicate that there's no minimum point. I'm stuck. Please help!
 

Attachments

  • Qs.jpg
    Qs.jpg
    35.2 KB · Views: 613
Physics news on Phys.org
Then I would like to see how you obtain the simplified expression for U :smile:

My result is: U = k(a-l_o)^2 + k(1-\frac{l_o}{a})x^2 + k(1-\frac{l_o}{a})y^2

Why does \partial U/\partial x = 0 not give any solution?
 
hikaru1221 said:
Then I would like to see how you obtain the simplified expression for U :smile:

My result is: U = k(a-l_o)^2 + k(1-\frac{l_o}{a})x^2 + k(1-\frac{l_o}{a})y^2

Why does \partial U/\partial x = 0 not give any solution?

Can you show me how you arrive at the expression for U? I've tried to derive U from force consideration, the resulting expression looks way too complicated. The expression obtained by merely adding the potential energy from both springs is still too complicated as well.

Thanks for your help :)
 
From your exact expression of U:

U = \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2 + \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2

We have:

U = k(a^2+x^2+y^2+l_o^2-2l_o(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}+\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}))

Notice that:

\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1+\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1-\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

(due to a\sqrt{1+\epsilon} \approx a(1 + \frac{\epsilon}{2}) )

And we arrive at the result.
 
hikaru1221 said:
From your exact expression of U:

U = \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2 + \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2

We have:

U = k(a^2+x^2+y^2+l_o^2-2l_o(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}+\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}))

Notice that:

\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1+\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1-\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

(due to a\sqrt{1+\epsilon} \approx a(1 + \frac{\epsilon}{2}) )

And we arrive at the result.

Thank you so much! I'm a newbie and am still not used to approximation technique, thanks for the great help!
 
hikaru1221 said:
From your exact expression of U:

U = \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2 + \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2

We have:

U = k(a^2+x^2+y^2+l_o^2-2l_o(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}+\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}))

Notice that:

\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1+\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1-\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

(due to a\sqrt{1+\epsilon} \approx a(1 + \frac{\epsilon}{2}) )

And we arrive at the result.
why did you not treat the constant k as, kx and ky??
Can you combine them like that? because i thought that the problem statement given has them as separate constants? help me please
 
i have this as the exact same question. i was wondering if i could get some clarification on the two different k constants. what is the next step?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K