Stability of a system with poles and zeros at infinity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The system transfer function H(s) = 1/(e^s + 10) has been analyzed for stability. The pole is located at s = ln(10) + j(2k+1)π, where k is an integer, indicating that the system is unstable as poles exist in the right half of the complex plane. The Fourier transform does not exist for this system due to its non-absolutely integrable nature over the interval from negative to positive infinity. Therefore, the conclusion is that the system is unstable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms and their application in control theory
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their representation in the complex plane
  • Knowledge of stability criteria for linear systems
  • Ability to solve exponential equations involving complex variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the stability criteria for linear systems in control theory
  • Learn how to solve exponential equations of the form e^x = -a
  • Explore the implications of poles in the right half of the complex plane on system stability
  • Investigate the conditions for the existence of Fourier transforms in continuous-time systems
USEFUL FOR

Control engineers, systems analysts, and students studying stability in linear systems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focusing on transfer functions and their implications for system behavior.

purplebird
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have a system transfer function

H(s) = 1/(e^s + 10)

This system has both poles and zeros at infinity and -infinity.

Can anybody tell me if this is a stable system. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must show your own work before we can help you. You know that.
 
As shown H(s) has no zeros, and it has a pole at e^s=-10, not at +/-infinity
 
e^s = -10 is the pole. You cannot solve this equation. ln(-10) does not exist. That is why i concluded the pole is at infinity. Is my conclusion wrong?
 
Yes you can solve it. The solutions are complex. One solution is s = i*pi+Ln(10)
 
So the pole is at 2.3 (ln 10) +j 3.14. SO this is an unstable system. Am I correct? Also Fourier transform does not exist for this am I right? Since it not abolutely integrable within - infinity and infinity.
 
purplebird said:
So the pole is at 2.3 (ln 10) +j 3.14. SO this is an unstable system. Am I correct? Also Fourier transform does not exist for this am I right? Since it not abolutely integrable within - infinity and infinity.

In continuous time, the Laplace transform is used to obtain the transfer function. A system is stable if the poles of this transfer function lie strictly in the closed left half of the complex plane (i.e. the real part of all the poles is less than zero).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_theory
 
purplebird said:
So the pole is at 2.3 (ln 10) +j 3.14. SO this is an unstable system. Am I correct? Also Fourier transform does not exist for this am I right? Since it not abolutely integrable within - infinity and infinity.
As The Electrician said, this is ONE of the solutions. There is an infinity of them, in the form ln(10) + j(2k+1)pi.
 
So stability depends om the value of k? Can somebody point me to a good link which teaches how to solve equations like e^x = -a;
 
  • #10
purplebird said:
So stability depends om the value of k? Can somebody point me to a good link which teaches how to solve equations like e^x = -a;

k is an integer variable that can take any value between minus infinity and plus infinity. Since for an infinity of values of k the poles lie on the RHP, the system is unstable.
For an explanation on solving your equation see
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/61830.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K