Standing Waves on a String with a Free End

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of determining the wavelengths of resonant vibrations of a string with one end fixed and the other free. The context involves understanding standing waves and their formation through the superposition of waves traveling in opposite directions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the phase shifts of incident and reflected waves, questioning the implications of phase changes at boundaries. There is a focus on the conditions under which a phase change of π occurs and its relevance to the equations governing the waves.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of phase shifts and their effects on wave equations are being explored. Some participants suggest that the phase change of the reflected wave is crucial to understanding the overall behavior of the standing wave, while others express uncertainty about the implications of negative phase values.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the phase change occurs differently depending on whether the wave reflects from a denser to a rarer medium or vice versa. There is also mention of the implications of fixed and free ends on the phase of the waves involved.

e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Standing Waves on a String with a Free End

Problem.
A string can have a "free" end if that end is attached to a ring that can slide without friction on a vertical pole. Determine the wavelengths of the resonant vibrations of such a string with one end fixed and the other free.

By resonant vibrations, I guess they mean standing waves. A standing wave is the superposition of two waves traveling in opposite direction right? The general equation of a traveling wave is given by

D(x,t) = D_M \sin (kx \pm \omega t + \phi)

Suppose the pole is on the left side. Let L be the distance from the pole to the fixed end. To create waves, one would have to move the ring up and down at some particular frequency right? That means that the equation of the wave traveling to the left has a non-zero phase angle \phi. Let

D_1 = D_M \sin (kx - \omega t + \phi)

be the equation of this wave. The reflected wave is the same as the incident wave except that it is traveling to the right and since it starts from a fixed location, its phase angle is zero. Let

D_2 = D_M \sin (kx + \omega t)

be the equation of this wave. The equation of the standing wave is

D = D_1 + D_2 = 2D_M \sin (kx + \phi/2) \cos (\phi/2 - \omega t)

D = 0 at x = L which means that kL + \phi/2 = n \pi for some non-negative integer n or

\lambda = \frac{4 \pi L}{2\pi n - \phi}

My book has as its answer 4L/(2n - 1). It's as if they decided to make \phi = \pi. Why is that?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
e(ho0n3 said:
Problem. The reflected wave is the same as the incident wave except that it is traveling to the right and since it starts from a fixed location, its phase angle is zero. Let

D_2 = D_M \sin (kx + \omega t)

be the equation of this wave.

When a wave is reflected it suffers a phase change of 'pi'. Hence the value of phi is 'pi'.
 
Not always, if the medium is free, the just the direction changes, if it isnt, then the phase change also takes place.

air to water is not a free medium boundary. water to air is. (denser->rarer).
 
oh! sorry. I forgot to tell : pi phase change occurs when wave reflects from rarer to denser interface
 
Sourabh N said:
When a wave is reflected it suffers a phase change of 'pi'. Hence the value of phi is 'pi'.

What does the phase change of the reflected wave have to do with the incident wave's phase shift? How is this evident from the equations?
 
e(ho0n3 said:
What does the phase change of the reflected wave have to do with the incident wave's phase shift? How is this evident from the equations?

I think I understand now. Given the equation of the reflected wave:

D_2 = D_M \sin (kx + \omega t)

the incident wave will have a phase shift of 180 degrees or \pi and will travel in the opposite direction. Hence, its equation must be:

D_1 = D_M \sin (kx - \omega t + \pi)

Now, given the equation of the incident wave:

D_1 = D_M \sin (kx - \omega t + \phi)

the equation of the reflected wave must be

D_2 = D_M \sin (kx + \omega t + \phi + \pi)

and since the phase shift of this equation must be 0 (because of the fixed end), then \phi + \pi = 0. Hence \phi = -\pi. Hmm...but this is negative though.
 
Last edited:
e(ho0n3 said:
D_2 = D_M \sin (kx + \omega t + \phi + \pi)

and since the phase shift of this equation must be 0 (because of the fixed end), then \phi + \pi = 0. Hence \phi = -\pi. Hmm...but this is negative though.

It just realized, after fiddling with the equation a bit, that it doesn't matter if the phase shift is negavite. The wavelengths of the resonant vibrations will still be 4L/(2n - 1).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K