Standing Waves (tension vs. wavelength)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between tension (T) and wavelength squared (λ²) in standing waves on a string. The derived equation is T = (μf²)λ², where μ represents linear mass density and f is frequency. The slope of the T vs. λ² graph corresponds to the product of μ and f², indicating that the slope is a measure of the string's mass density when frequency is held constant. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding how the graph is generated from experimental data involving varying tension and frequency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics, specifically standing waves
  • Familiarity with the concepts of tension and linear mass density (μ)
  • Knowledge of the wave equation v = fλ
  • Ability to interpret graphs in the context of physical relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the wave equation and its implications for standing waves
  • Learn about the experimental setup for measuring tension and frequency in wave experiments
  • Explore the concept of linear mass density (μ) and its calculation for different materials
  • Investigate the relationship between frequency, tension, and wavelength in various wave systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in wave mechanics, particularly those studying standing waves and their properties in strings.

furiouspoodle
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to decode a graph of Tension vs. \lambda^2 of standing waves on a string to understand the actual meaning of the slope. I also need to derive the equation for the line from two expressions:

v= \sqrt{T/\mu}
v= f\lambda

Homework Equations



\lambda=2L/n
\mu = m/L

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm starting to think I'm completely missing something in my initial approach.

v = \sqrt {T/\mu}

v^2 = T/\mu

v = f\lambda

v^2 = (f\lambda)^2

T/\mu = f^2\lambda^2

T = \mu f^2\lambda^2

T = \frac {\mu f^2 4L^2}{n^2}

I feel like it should lead to a clearer solution than this one, but I'm not sure what. I first thought that the slope was simply a surface tension (dynes/cm^2) on the string but I don't see how that relates to the equation or slope I'm trying to find.

I also tried this:

f = \frac {v}{\lambda}

f = \frac {\sqrt {T/\mu}}{\lambda}

f^2 = \frac {T/\mu}{\lambda^2}

\mu f^2 = \frac {T}{\lambda^2}

which seems closer, but I don't know how to apply it in a usable manner. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The OP found the correct relation ##T = (\mu f^2)\lambda^2##. Thus, the physical interpretation of the slope of the ##T## vs. ##\lambda^2## graph is that it represents the product of ##\mu## and ##f^2##. I think that should be an acceptable answer.
 
I grappled with this question without coming to a satisfactory conclusion. The OP mentions a graph of tension vs. λ2 which presumably was produced from collected data. If one varies the tension and finds the frequency of the fundamental for fixed wavelength λ = 2L, the relation between the tension and the frequency is ##T=4L^2\mu f^2.## In that case, a plot of T vs. (2Lf)2 would yield a straight line with slope equal to ##\mu.## We need additional information about how this graph was produced from what data. It might elucidate the need for plotting tension vs. wavelength squared.
 
kuruman said:
I grappled with this question without coming to a satisfactory conclusion. The OP mentions a graph of tension vs. λ2 which presumably was produced from collected data. If one varies the tension and finds the frequency of the fundamental for fixed wavelength λ = 2L, the relation between the tension and the frequency is ##T=4L^2\mu f^2.## In that case, a plot of T vs. (2Lf)2 would yield a straight line with slope equal to ##\mu.## We need additional information about how this graph was produced from what data. It might elucidate the need for plotting tension vs. wavelength squared.
Ok. Thanks.

Maybe it's just me, but if the graph plots T vs λ2 as stated by the OP, then it doesn't make sense to me to think of the wavelength as fixed.
 
TSny said:
Ok. Thanks.

Maybe it's just me, but if the graph plots T vs λ2 as stated by the OP, then it doesn't make sense to me to think of the wavelength as fixed.
It doesn't make much sense to me either. In a standing wave experiment the wavelength can be varied by varying the driving frequency at fixed tension. I can think of an experiment in which one fixes the driving frequency, varies the tension and then finds the separation between the ends that will produce the same order harmonic. Then one can make sense of a T vs. λ2 plot.
 
kuruman said:
I can think of an experiment in which one fixes the driving frequency, varies the tension...
Yes, that's what I had in mind. The tension can be due to some hanging weights. The weights are varied to get different standing waves (with different wavelengths) with the same fixed frequency.
 
TSny said:
Yes, that's what I had in mind. The tension can be due to some hanging weights. The weights are varied to get different standing waves (with different wavelengths) with the same fixed frequency.
With near-zero probability of getting clarifications from the OP we can only guess ##\dots##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
836
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K