Starting books for Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on recommended books for studying Quantum Mechanics (QM) for beginners. Key suggestions include "Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications" by Nouredine Zettili, praised for its extensive problem sets and clarity, and "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David McIntyre, noted for its modern approach. While some participants recommend Griffiths' QM book for its conversational style, others criticize it for lacking depth and rigor. The Feynman Lectures, particularly Volume 3, and "Quantum Mechanics and Experience" by David Albert are also highlighted as valuable resources.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of linear algebra
  • Familiarity with fundamental physics concepts
  • Mathematical proficiency for problem-solving in QM
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications" by Nouredine Zettili
  • Read "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David McIntyre
  • Explore the Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 3
  • Investigate "Thirty Years That Shook Physics" by George Gamow for historical context
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate students, aspiring physicists, and anyone seeking a foundational understanding of Quantum Mechanics through structured learning resources.

Avimanyu Ray
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
Hello I'm an undergrad. Can anyone suggest me books, articles, lectures for studying quantum mechanics as a fresh starter? I tried r. Shankar but it only mathematical to me, couldn't get the physical significance. On the other hand, Griffith got way deep in concepts without sufficient examples and practice.
So how can I develop my aptitude and logic in quantum world?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Feynman lectures, volume 3, but I suggest you read them all and in order.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Avimanyu Ray
I really like Ghirardi's "Sneaking a look at God's cards".
 
I think Zettili's book is the best I've come across. It has something like 600 solved/unsolved problems throughout and is well written. Just stay away from Griffiths QM book. It's awful in my opinion.
 
Yet many knowledge and experienced researchers and educators here highly recommend Griffith book.
 
Well given the many questions of confused students reading Griffiths's QM book, I have my doubts. However, I've not looked very carefully at the book myself.
 
houlahound said:
Yet many knowledge and experienced researchers and educators here highly recommend Griffith book.
I think most people use Griffiths book because it is "simple" and "conversational" and doesn't put too much work into prerequisites. I found this a bloody disaster and my confusion was immediately cleared-up when I switched to Zettili.
 
  • #10
Einstein once wisely sait: "You should explain things as simple as possible but not simpler." ...
 
  • #11
snatchingthepi said:
I think most people use Griffiths book because it is "simple" and "conversational" and doesn't put too much work into prerequisites. I found this a bloody disaster and my confusion was immediately cleared-up when I switched to Zettili.

I had a quick look at Zettili. Very interesting.

"Energy and time, for instance, form a pair of complementary variables. Their simultaneous
measurement must obey the time–energy uncertainty relation:
$$\Delta E \Delta t \ge \frac{\hbar}{2}$$
This relation states that if we make two measurements of the energy of a system and if these
measurements are separated by a time interval ##\Delta t## the measured energies will differ by an
amount ##\Delta E## which can in no way be smaller than ##\frac{\hbar}{\Delta t}##."

Griffiths has too much to say on the time-energy relation to quote it all, but regarding the HUP he says:

"The position-momentum uncertainty principle is often written in the form:
$$\Delta x \Delta p \ge \frac{\hbar}{2}$$
##\Delta x## (the uncertainty in ##x##) is loose notation (and sloppy language) for the standard deviation of the results of repeated experiments on identically prepared systems."

I prefer Griffiths' precision, even though his book has a reputation for being simplistic. Unlike Zettili, when he dodges an issue, he always let's you know.
 
  • #12
In this example Zetttili (whose book I don't know at all) is worse than Griffiths, because it's not sloppy but plain wrong since time is not an observable in QT. Then better read Pauli, Dirac, or another serious book on the subject. I recommend to start with Sakurai and then Weinberg.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
  • #14
If we are talking about textbook at that level then my recommendation is https://redirect.viglink.com/?forma... Fusion of Science and Community&txt=McIntyreor https://redirect.viglink.com/?forma...e Fusion of Science and Community&txt=Sakuraior https://redirect.viglink.com/?forma... Fusion of Science and Community&txt=TownSend- each uses spins first approach which in my opinion much easier and modern way to learn Quantum Mechanics. I personally like McIntyre the best.

If I were you I would learn linear algebra first and then read Shttps://www.amazon.com/dp/B00FD36G1Q/?tag=pfamazon01-20to get a decent overall picture and then read https://redirect.viglink.com/?forma... Fusion of Science and Community&txt=McIntyre.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
  • #15
What's up with Amazon, you used to get sample pages to browse. Has this function been disabled.

I am more likely to buy a book if I can sample it.
 
  • #16
I'm not saying ignore the most recent textbooks on QM, but I like Introduction to Quantum Mechanics With Applications to Chemistry by Linus Pauling and E. Bright Wilson Jr.

To balance that with something short and easy, I recommend starting out with Thirty Years That Shook Physics by Gamow. He has a talent for explaining things in simple terms. See for example his explanation of the blackbody radiation problem and his "butter" analogy for energy quanta.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K