So in a recent conversation I heard that in the recent interview given by President Bush, he was asked what was his greatest mistake to date, apparently he admitted to having made "No mistakes" (Please correct me if this is wrong, please!) to which it was pointed out that the reality in Politics is such that admiting to mistakes can cost a Country money inasmuch as there are Fiscal responsibilities involved in running a Country, the Taxpayers purse is to be gaurded from those who would use Honest admission of error as advantage to make themselves richer with the Taxpayers monies...so there is a sense of the reasons for the pretensciousness of political lives/life...but there is room for admission of personal error/failure,
if any can be found, as that would not entail unforseen restitutional costs to the taxpayer...
This is applicable to the situation, in my own personal life, with respect to my current position repective of the Government of Canada...
But something else struck me, personally, as it was something that I had been reminded of, recently, in passing, by someone who 'sheltered', (At the shelter I stay in, recently, briefly) the Axiom of the Bible that tells of God telling that he (God) "Stays Distant from the Proud", begging the question of President Bush's position as a Born Again Christian, with respect to his personal relationship with God, is he in error?, or being Kept Distant?
By God Because of Pride?, as that would be an error, and one that is
not politically irresponsible inasmuch as there is NO cost to the Taxpayers purse for such a degree of Honsety, simple Christian Honesty, but there is a cost, to someone who willfuly self decieves, themselves, thinking that they are close to God when actions speak waaaaay louder then just about any Words you can find, cause actions always speak Truth, words? well...
This is applicable to my own suituation, in the idea of the responsibility of the Taxpayers purse, for at this moment in time, for the Government to give me a letter of proof, is to supply me the means to sue the people of Canada for the lack of reciept of that very same letter, in a timely fashion, and what it has now cost me to get to a point wherein, I can get them to respond? this need to "go public" about myself, and the Work(s) that I have, and can, do...the Homelessness is involved in that, soooo
The last (previous) Prime Minster is known for having stated that; "In Politics, the Perceptions are sometimes more important then the reality" which has some truth to it (politically speaking) but an astute politician needs to know when the reality is actually more important then the perception, and act accordingly...
Clearly there is a need for some form of restitutuion to me for what I have had to endure in this endevour, clearly for me to go the Court route is time consuming and costly to the Canadian peoples, but worse is the potential political costs to the Counrty itself, am I acting responsibly, myself, if I can get an investigation of the Government of Canada Launched by the Supreme Court of Canada as to accommodate my right to the accreditation, hence Quite possibly disrupting the operations of the Country itself, possible causeing great damage to the political structure(s) of the Country, possibly changing the politcal landscape and nature of Canada, foreever, and what is that to cost? cause that might just be too much... to me, much safer they admit the error, we fix it, and go on...but it is their move now, not mine...
Have a nice evening!
