Starting Over: Tales of Rebuilding from the Bottom

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

apparently, I am about to be banned from these forums, sooo

C:\YA!

 

[Mattius_]

Why?

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Originally posted by Mattius_
Why?

Good question answering will simply bring the risk of it back, so if you would excuze me, I would not respond in full to it suffice to say it was an "informational dispute" ...

That stated, and the above about recognition etc. It is in the history of my life that I had the opportunity, God's Grace, to know what Might be coming towards me, inasmuch as it is seeming to me that I could author a omplete T.o.E. hence the idea of fame, is relative, as such an emission from myself would probably bring World Wide recogniton, that is why (partially) I knew that I could take this one, with the Canadian Government, and successfully execute the result privately...still had opportunity/potential for Great Fame, something that I was, neither, looking for, nor shunning, but simply accepting it as it is, or becomes, a responcibility in my life, a social responcibiity...means I have to do it, and, by God's Grace, I know it, and accept it...no problemo...

Anyone tellng you different, is lieing, and there have been a few of those surrounding not me persay, but my life, inasmuch as they seem to have set themselves up as people who "know me" and thereafter abuse me by that insinuated knowledge that is perhaps partially true, yet wholely provable for anything that I wrote (just ask them to see the letter where I stated whatever they are trying to tell you I said, thereafter net postings...Uhmmmm trust adulterability, well, do you trust net generated evidence? but that's another story altogether) and thereafter anything that they would wish to tell you, that I have, supposedly, or purportedly, told them, well you open the door of the 'Lieing gossip' as that is mostly what was spread about me, for many a years...

That's another story all-together, just that it posits a forwarning about people claiming to know me, claiming to be quoteing me, claiming to know my thoughts (Oh ya?...prove it!) people who will use, and abuse, you for there end of getting at me, stopping, and/or impeding me in my quest for a proper venue for the presentation of a T.o.E. over in England/London/Britain (seat/cradle of democracy and democratic right in/for this past millenium) as I has already exhausted all means of venue in the US...(actually I didn't exhaust them, an American exhausted them for me, but it works out to the same ends, the answer was/is 'NO') and venue in Canada is simply unacceptable, why, heck go back and reread all of what I have written cause you don't see the way my own country is treating me, which only suffices to ensure their exclusion, based upon their willfull ignorance, as attempt at control...soooo

But I can tell you, what they wanted me to know about fame, simple, make someone famous, without their knowing how your 'spreading the word' (of mouth) and you can do a lots of damage to that person, especially if you can get the social ostrasization thing going as has/had been done with/to me, then again I also suffer the lack of $ocialability (Can't be "Social" if you have no Money!) that comes from fame without fortune, added into the beseting of the few (adds quickly) in society that want only for taking whatever they can, from others, anyway they can...and I have had to live with some of them soooo... (sorta like "Sleeping with the Enemy")

Anyways...if I don't get banned, perhaps more, later...

 

[hitssquad]

Originally posted by timejim
you must have a computer and electricity and maybe a phone line to go online or how else could you post??

...From a public terminal.





-Chris

 

[jimmy p]

Barring you?? Why that's INSANE!

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Originally posted by jimmy p
Barring you?? Why that's INSANE!

No it's fixed...and the one above,...also, a public library, or a (Nice) Universitie's library...so long as Respect is maintained...(EDIT by me! towards 'them'...The students/faculty/staff etc.)

(lookitthat! 241)

 

[firefly]

Yippeeeeeee! What would we do without our One Man Thank Tink of occasional Thunkful persuasion!

 

[member 5645]

Originally posted by Mr. Robin Parsons
So, my stating the above, "bested by Moi" is NOT a manner that I, personally, think in, cause to me to state something like that, is arrogant because it is patently false!

Yes, I, By the Grace of God, did come up with a solution to a perniscious International legal problem respecting the "Rights of the General Public V Pedophiles" and am the 'first' one to do that.

But clearly I had/have advantages, in my ignorance of the law inasmuch as I, being outside of the field, was NOT subjected to the intimidational forces of the "Water Cooler" talk amongst lawyers, people in the legal system, that would be making very clear the extent of "other" law that such a definition would need cover, without changing any of it! a very humbling and Intimidating concept, to be sure.

Never mind the Simplicity that this man is a trained Lawyer, not a chance I could best him at the Law, not in any kind of real contest (lest it be a court case and (provable) truth is on my side) of legal Knolwedge, he'd whomp my Butt.

So, this changes little for what this thread started out to be, sorta, but it is a venue of speech, Free speech, soooo...

The solution itself is simply a "Proof", in a manner of speaking, even though, normally, a Court cannot accept the unsubstantiated testimony of one individual as a proof, ordinarily, this circumstance is, and was, different, as the work itself, when read, reveals somthing of the inside of yourself, how an "assemblage of your understanding", (words) fits together, and when sequenced out properly, illustrate the function of the flowthrough of information in a human's "Realm of the imagination", thus rendering that expression "Works of the Imagination" as a 'self description'.

This is (some) of how I got...here?

Well I have done some research on the Sharpe case, and am I to follow that you wrote the basis for the original 1993 child pornography law?

I make this assertion based on you mentiong this "going on for 10 years", the Sharpe case, and the quote about victory for children (which was "astounding victory for children" as far as I can find in my searching).
Let me try to piece this together:

-I don't know what you did before this period of time.
-1993 rolls around and you put together a 'proof' to base a law on for determining the difference between an innocent pic of kid in the bathtub and real child porn.
-You offer this to the government in good faith, or perhaps a deal.
-The government screws you. Legislators and lawyers put it together in legal mumbo jumbo, pass it as law, and enjoy their success.
-You mention your solution to the Sharpe case in Calgary (or elsewhere in an earlier time) and someone else (possibly the person you spoke to in Calgary) and they take credit for it (part of me asks whether this is connected to the other person at your Shelter who has been in the paper twice now with offers of assistance. But that could just be me wanting to piece all of your life back to a single point ;) )
-Through outside pressures, and the powers that be, you are made a social leper of some sort.

I don't follow what these pressures were, assuming they were external, and I don't follow exactly who in America has swindled you as well (unless you 1> sent your idea here and a duplicate event happened 2> your work has been used as a foundation for other countries to follow)


Well, let's see what response this generates.

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Speaks of the abilities of communication in written English language...

Originally posted by phatmonky
Well I have done some research on the Sharpe case, and am I to follow that you wrote the basis for the original 1993 child pornography law? NO, the law was challenged, starting in the courts in British Columbia, to the Supreme Court of BC, then to the Supreme Court of Canada, I had nothing to do with the writing of the original law...[/color]

I make this assertion based on you mentiong this "going on for 10 years", the Sharpe case, and the quote about victory for children (which was "astounding victory for children" as far as I can find in my searching). You are starting to blend together parts of my life in a manner that they are, NOT blended, by myself, nor in the manner that I have told it...the 'ten years' (plus) is/are other things..."Victory for all the Children of Canada..." was the quote I had heard, and read, at and around that time...[/color]
Let me try to piece this together:

-I don't know what you did before this period of time.
-1993 rolls around and you put together a 'proof' to base a law on for determining the difference between an innocent pic of kid in the bathtub and real child porn. TOTALLY WRONG[/color]
-You offer this to the government in good faith, <--Yup...Nope--->[/color] or perhaps a deal.
-The government screws you. Legislators and lawyers put it together in legal mumbo jumbo, pass it as law, and enjoy their success. Again totally wrong[/color]
-You mention your solution to the Sharpe case in Calgary (or elsewhere in an earlier time) and someone else (possibly the person you spoke to in Calgary) and they Ahem the government of Canada Took credit for it...the Liberal Party...[/color] take credit for it (part of me asks whether this is connected to the other person at your Shelter who has been in the paper twice now with offers of assistance. But that could just be me wanting to piece all of your life back to a single point ;) ) Nope, and yup[/color]
-Through outside pressures, and the powers that be, you are made a social leper of some sort. Actually organized social gossips...et al and the medias complete absence of respecting it's required legal social obligation >> licensed broadcasters after all...[/color]
I don't follow what these pressures were, assuming they were external, and I don't follow exactly who in America has swindled you as well (unless you 1> sent your idea here and a duplicate event happened 2> your work has been used as a foundation for other countries to follow) That was 'other work'(s), not this/ (/that...the Sharpe one) particular piece of writing[/color]


Well, let's see what response this generates.

Hows this?

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Originally posted by phatmonky
(SNIP)[/color] Well I have done some research on the Sharpe case, Well, let's see what response this generates. (SNoP)[/color]

No offence, but, one that would question, either, your patience with yourself, respective of you 'having read' and not taken the time to arrange the presented (by me) thoughts, or one that asks of your reading Comprehension skills inasmuch as (speed?) 'read', but, clearly, not understood, nor assimilated in what is it's presentation, as evidenced by your responce to me...that kind of generated responce...again, no offence

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

BTW phatmonky my impression(s) of you are not really what you seem to be demonstrating yourself to be, in that last one, but, as that is just my opinon, I could be wrong...but, please, don't try to 'goad' me, cause...
then you , soooo...O.K. [?]

 

[member 5645]

Originally posted by Mr. Robin Parsons
BTW phatmonky my impression(s) of you are not really what you seem to be demonstrating yourself to be, in that last one, but, as that is just my opinon, I could be wrong...but, please, don't try to 'goad' me, cause...
then you , soooo...O.K. [?]

I don't follow. I'm not sure what your impression of me was before. 'Kind of response' was simply a comment from me on poking in the dark trying to catch up on something you have been discussing since long before I joined this board. Pardon me if I missed some points that you hold to be common knowledge (after all, you'd be surpised how much easier it is for you to understand your own posts, and references to other posts, than it is for someone else). I did the best I could with your allusions to other threads, in this thread, and quickly following links to other links.

That said, there's no 'goading' involved here. I was simply tryign to catch up with the rest of the crowd on what is associated with this situation, and what is reference to other parts of you life (disassociated.)


P.S. No offense taken, if you won't take any when I say "you write how you think". Not really a bad thing per say, for I do it as well, but it does make it hard to follow (as a total outsider) when you reference something, someone asks abotu it, and then you reference something else already said (and then repeat). I don't often take much time to read other people's lives online (i simply don't usually care to), so part of it is my lack of patience on trying to catch up without knowing if the answers I want were even posted before.

 

[chroot]

Why in the world is this thread still going? Gah.

- Warren

 

[member 5645]

Originally posted by chroot
Why in the world is this thread still going? Gah.

- Warren

Because you and I can't stop posting in it. Gah?


- monky

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Originally posted by chroot
Why in the world is this thread still going? Gah.

- Warren

Because of me... why else?

P.S. phatmonky agree/agreed/agreeable/agreeably...(sometimes me too!)...no I don't assume it's "common knowledge" but I understand the perspective, try to write to compensate, and know that that is mostly the problem, for me(?), the amount I need to explain to get them even close to what it is that I "know"...and all that follows that...

Insert whomever twisting your arms to read this...NAH!

 

[Andy]

I always ask myself why i am still reading this thread, and i haven't a clue why. Phatmonkey, i don't think anybody knows what it is the Mr Robin Parsons did, other than himself and the government involved. I have been a regular for about one and half years now and have had many discussions with MRP about this subject and have never got anywhere.

Would be interesting to find out just what it is though.

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Originally posted by Andy
(SNIP)[/color] I have been a regular for about one and half years now and have had many discussions with MRP about this subject s-t-r-e-t-c-h-i-n-g it just a little...aren't we? [/color]
Would be interesting to find out just what it is though. (SNoP)[/color]

Pssst they call it r-e-a-d-i-n-g...then comprehension...then again...

 

[Andy]

Good to see that your still here.

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

U2 !

 

[Andy]

Cheers, been away for the past 2 weeks doing a really boring course about motor vehicle's. It wouldn't be soo boring if the other students weren't quite so stupid mind you.

Bit off topic but i don't care.

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

So then start a thread on it..."bore away" at your boredom thread yourself in...you know **** it

(Ohh Andy, MRP used a bad word!)

 

[Andy]

Nah i can't be bothered to start a thread about being bored. I will just hijack one of your threads.

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

So if anyone else has questions, or answers, please go ahead, otherwise I'll probably just keep going on, as I have, throughout all of these times...Tanks!

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Have been listening to the latest scandal of this Liberal (party) government, people wondering if the present Prime Minster "knew", as the last Prime Minster Should have known (which clearly he did, as that would be why he had stopped short the last session of parliament, just as that Auditors report was about to become public...hence he delayed it's release and dropped it into the hands of his (then) rival, the Present Prime Minster)...makes me wonder if I could prove that "they know"...Humm, person who was Attorney General, at the time of the Sharpe case, is NOW the Deputy Prime Minster! (?) so how is anyone going to tell me that the former Attorney General, who is/was required, by law, to tell the then Prime Minster just how the Constitutional Challenge (to the Countries Constitution/Charter of Rights) was solved, somehow doesn't know this any more, and has done NOTHING to tell this to the Current Prime Minster, who, as a member of the Liberal Party of Canada, should know as they, The Party, were sent the information, and know of the problem, should know, from several levels of positions within that party, and the simplicity that it is a responcibility of the Office of the Prime Minster of Canada, so he should have been told in the official exchange that took place when the office's powers and RESPONCIBILITIES were passed to him...

Makes me wonder what they wait for, as waiting is simply irresponcible...makes me wonder what is wrong with the Canadian media, "no news reporting on me" or this case, something that would have allowed them to 'skewer' the present government, wonder if they are playing political favoritism as Not taking a chance to "skewer a government" in defence of one 'ordinary citizen' is about as far from what these people do as you can get, and they have gone to that point "volontarily"...means they are in on it, NO DOUBT!

What a disgusting place to live, gives me lots of reasons for wanting to get out of, what they have turned into a S*** hole for me now, and never come back...

Really truly represents making this country into one of the worst places on Earth to live if you have even an Iota of Brains, and no paperwork to back it up, cause they are disgusting thieves!

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Funny, reading todays Globe and Mail, a National newspaper out of Toronto, inside is a printed letter from a Canadian Senator that is supposed to be a private communications with other members of the Canadian Government during Caucus meetings, led in (headlined) by the newspapers observation of just how difficult it is to keep a secret!...unless it's me...

As to the leaking of information by the members of a Caucus, to the Media, I would support the idea of Members of a political party who, knowing that they do not have enough power to have it addressed properly, thinking that it might not be being done "in the countries best interests", seeking assistance 'covertly' from the media, in this manner, as they get to keep their respective representation of the population/people who/that elected them...so here's to freedom of speech, it helps keep the interests of the Country at Front and Center of the (media driven) Nation's (National) attention...

So...anyone willing to help me move? (not much 'stuff'...brain is "highly portable"...come with it's own head! )

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Oft have I wondered...how much longer?

 

[zoobyshoe]

Originally posted by Mr. Robin Parsons So...anyone willing to help me move? (not much 'stuff'...brain is "highly portable"...come with it's own head! )

Where you headed?

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Originally posted by zoobyshoe
Where you headed?

It's in here...first choice (now?) would still be London, if possible, second Choice London (Great Britain, not Ontario) third choice would follow as "The City of London" In the Land across the Atlantic Ocean called "Great Britain"...and well, I'd like to see somewhere where democracy had roots, and is rooted in history, for milenia, and Well London England would sound nice, so, whadda you tink?

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

So just went to a coffee store and was entertained by a man, telling his child, with him, not to "look at that guy, 'cause he's a Pot Smoker"...looking at me...Hummmm

Lets see now, just coming out of 12 to 13 years of social (Canadian!) abuse, at the hands of malicious gossips, making false accusations about me behind my back, and the fact of my complete social ostracization precludes me (half the time) from even knowing what is being said about me behind my back and now this...

If there is a single one of you with proof, please take it to the police and have me arrested immediately, otherwise, perhaps you should simply act like a little bit smarter adult and know that there are stupid, malicious people, in society, who will intentionaly start any rumor they can about anyone whom they think they can target that way...you should know it is that, cause otherwise, I would be In a courtroom being CHARGED with a CRIME by the PERSON ACCUSING ME!...otherwise, it is you who "aid and abet" the commission of a CRIME...

 

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Read the above posting before you read this one cause some of you need to figure some things out, like the consequences of your actions, and inactions, inasmuch as the stress levels, and the just plain FRUSTRATION that what has been going on in my life for the last umpteen years is the kind of thing that "DRIVES people to DRINK"...that expression you'll accept, but if I was to say "it drives someone to use marijuana", (Medicinally a SEDATIVE!) you'll freak out, and scream, and complain, and cry about it...if it had driven me to drink, then I might have made the papers by now, for the problems that I would have caused, freaking out about all of this, while drunk...but that hasn't happened, and isn't going to...BUT the point needs be noted by all of you as it is that kind of situation wherein you are probably more responcible, cause anyone put through this kind of Societal/social ABUSE, ABUSIVENESS, is someone who will be looking for some kind of emotional release, stress release, anguish release, release from the appearance of hopelessness and despair that all of this kind of overt lunacy and complete idiocy and mockery of Canada and Canadian Justice rights law causes, this attempt at complete and total piracy of My very Life, the idea that I should, now, sue the governement for redress is simply a confused attempt to Extort Me of even more of my time, extortion by process, as TIME is all I HAVE! and "Ya" it is clear, that is what you all want of me, to stay here, go F*** yourselves, will ya, cause you are truly disgusting/revileing/abusive/cruel/blackhearted/ignorant/stupid/and INSANE! (and you would be/are the driving cause of it!)

Your/this ruse is disgustingly obvious, and proves you to be, what you are!