Mr. Robin Parsons
- 1,243
- 0
So I've got two 'stories' to tell, this one first...
I Have admitted to "Previous Use" why haven't I been arrested for that...well in law, if you do not have proof of the crime, you cannot proceed/prosecute, nor are you allowed to just assume it to be so, you must be able to prove it!
Having Marijuana (THC or THC Delta 9) in your bloodstream, is NOT illegal, the law is for Possession...if you partake of some by means of a method called a "Shotgun" (One person inhales the smoke into their mouth, and blows it into the open mouth of another person) in which the THC can be effectively ingested, it is without direct possession of the drug...that is why people who admit to "Previous Use" are not (generally) pursued in/by the law...(Ross Robagliati {SP??Pardon}) inasmuch as there is (must be) the Presumption of Innocence (that protects your sense of Freedom!) and the Law is NOT allowed to simply assume that because you admitted to having had it in you, that you had therefore possessed it, just NOT allowed, as it runs over individual Rights and Freedoms, left, right, and sideways!
It had been that I had wanted to be honest about it if I could as I knew that that was the only manner in which truthful information can come out...tell me, how do you craft good laws if you don't have any idea of just what the item you are criminalising does, is used, affects people and social situations, etc. etc. etc. it is only in honest discourse that we can arrive at manners of treating the root causes of addiction that begats the activity...otherwise we start criminalizing all sorts of what we see as deleterious activity, based upon our knowledge that they are addictions, and we start jailing Overweight people, Politicians for being addicted to their own egos, 'Cept that that is exactly what you NEED to be a politician, especially a good one, so on it goes...
Does that help?
The other one comes tomorrow, if possible...
I Have admitted to "Previous Use" why haven't I been arrested for that...well in law, if you do not have proof of the crime, you cannot proceed/prosecute, nor are you allowed to just assume it to be so, you must be able to prove it!
Having Marijuana (THC or THC Delta 9) in your bloodstream, is NOT illegal, the law is for Possession...if you partake of some by means of a method called a "Shotgun" (One person inhales the smoke into their mouth, and blows it into the open mouth of another person) in which the THC can be effectively ingested, it is without direct possession of the drug...that is why people who admit to "Previous Use" are not (generally) pursued in/by the law...(Ross Robagliati {SP??Pardon}) inasmuch as there is (must be) the Presumption of Innocence (that protects your sense of Freedom!) and the Law is NOT allowed to simply assume that because you admitted to having had it in you, that you had therefore possessed it, just NOT allowed, as it runs over individual Rights and Freedoms, left, right, and sideways!
It had been that I had wanted to be honest about it if I could as I knew that that was the only manner in which truthful information can come out...tell me, how do you craft good laws if you don't have any idea of just what the item you are criminalising does, is used, affects people and social situations, etc. etc. etc. it is only in honest discourse that we can arrive at manners of treating the root causes of addiction that begats the activity...otherwise we start criminalizing all sorts of what we see as deleterious activity, based upon our knowledge that they are addictions, and we start jailing Overweight people, Politicians for being addicted to their own egos, 'Cept that that is exactly what you NEED to be a politician, especially a good one, so on it goes...
Does that help?
The other one comes tomorrow, if possible...