Stat Mech vs. Greek atomistic hypothesis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hkyriazi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stat mech
AI Thread Summary
Statistical mechanics challenges the ancient Greek concept of hard, indestructible atoms by emphasizing the role of molecular chaos and entropy in gas behavior. Boltzmann's H-Theorem relies on the assumption that gas molecules are randomly distributed at equilibrium, which is generally supported for convex-shaped particles. However, the applicability of this principle to non-convex particles, such as the proposed needle-like objects in Frank Meno's model, remains unproven. Critics argue that Meno's hypothesis lacks meaningful physics and does not align with established theories in statistical mechanics. Understanding current theories is recommended over exploring unverified personal models.
hkyriazi
Messages
174
Reaction score
2
Has statistical mechanics anywhere disproven the ancient Greek idea that hard, indestructible objects (the original "atoms"), that experience no force other than that of impacts, can form the substratum of all material bodies and forces?

I've been reading Boltzmann's "Lectures on Gas Theory" (1896, 1898), and he states that his H-Theorem (which purports to show that entropy must always either increase or stay the same) is dependent upon the assumption of molecular chaos, i.e., that at equilibrium, any gas will have its molecules distributed randomly both in terms of position and velocity.

This seems inevitably to be true for the convexly-shaped particles that constitute atoms and even diatomic molecules (their dumbbell shape is still overall convex). But has it been proven to be true for any shaped particle whatsoever?

Specifically, I'm trying to evaluate the feasibility of a interesting model proposed by Frank Meno, which may be viewed at: crackpot link removed
It's an atomistic hypothesis, but postulates that a gas of hot, hard, semi-concave needle-like objects can maintain dynamically stable structures, despite constant collisions with each other, and no attractive forces between them. Does Stat Mech have anything to say about this, other than that we have no precedent for such a gas or for such behavior?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The site you linked is a personal theory. I could not detect a shred of meaningful physics. Do not waste your time attempting to unravel it, it is not worth your while. You would be better off making an efffor to understand the current theories.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top