Statement of Purpose: Physics Grad & International Student

  • Thread starter Thread starter diraccc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grad Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether an international student applying for physics PhD programs should mention their experience of only attending labs during their undergraduate studies, despite achieving high grades. The consensus leans against including this detail in the statement of purpose, as it may imply a lack of interest in the subject. The argument suggests that highlighting this could overshadow the positive aspect of good grades, which already demonstrate academic capability. It is emphasized that a PhD requires dedication and initiative, and mentioning a minimal engagement with coursework could be perceived negatively by admissions committees. The idea of independent study is acknowledged but deemed less compelling than the potential drawbacks of the statement.
diraccc
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm an international student applying to some physics phd programs, during my BS i only attended labs (here, attending lectures is not obligatory)... and still I got high grades.
the question is: "is this fact positive or negative to mention in my statement of purpose"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would definitely NOT mention that if I were you.
 
thanks, because I was thinking otherwise!
 
Don't take my answer as gold, it was given from a purely rational thinking perspective, so maybe someone else can chime in, as well. But to me, including this in your statement would suggest your disinterest in Physics, and the magnitude of this negative impact would be greater than any possible positive impact your ability to get good grades without attending lectures might have. If you have good grades, they are namely a testament of your abilities in and of itself, and need no additional "oh yeah, and I also wrote all of my tests with one of my eyes closed and three fingers tied together" bravado.
 
I would read that comment as "this candidate does that which is compulsory but nothing more". That is certainly not a good trait for a PhD, because nothing is compulsory, and you need to be highly dedicated in order to succeed.
 
what I had in mind is that indicates capabily of studying independently, but I think that the points you are making are more solid that mine
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
52
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top