Static equilibrium: mass on beam

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the static equilibrium of a mass on a beam, analyzing forces and moments using Newton's laws. The correct expressions for the forces exerted by the left and right fulcrums, ##F_L## and ##F_R##, are derived, with the correct formulas being ##F_R = g\Big(\frac{1}{2}m_B - m_D\Big)## and ##F_L = g\Big(2m_D + \frac{1}{2}m_B\Big)##. The participant identifies errors in their calculations, specifically neglecting the weight of the beam and misapplying Newton's linear second law. The discussion concludes with a reminder to carefully check algebraic manipulations and force components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with static equilibrium concepts
  • Knowledge of forces and moments in physics
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of static equilibrium in physics
  • Study the application of Newton's laws to rotational dynamics
  • Practice solving problems involving forces on beams
  • Learn about the importance of including all forces in equilibrium equations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone studying mechanics who seeks to understand the principles of static equilibrium and force analysis on beams.

jkfjbw
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A horizontal bar of length ##L## and mass ##m_B## is on two fulcrums, one ##L/3## from the left side of the bar, and the other ##L/3## from the right side of the bar. There is also a mass of mass ##m_D## on the left end of the bar. Find the forces that the fulcrums exert on the bar.
Relevant Equations
$$\sum_i \vec{F}_i = \vec{0}$$
$$\sum_i \tau_{z,i} = 0$$
A diagram of the physical situation is below:
IMG_1312.jpg

Choosing the positive ##y## direction to be upwards and the positive direction of rotation to be counterclockwise, Newton's linear second law gives:
$$-m_D g + F_L + F_R = 0$$
where ##F_L## is the magnitude of the force exerted on the bar by the left fulcrum, and ##F_R## is the magnitude of the force exerted on the bar by the right fulcrum. Taking the point of rotation to be around the left fulcrum, Newton's rotational second law gives:
$$(m_D g)\Big(\frac{L}{3}\Big) + F_R\Big(\frac{L}{3}\Big) - (m_B g)\Big(\frac{L}{6}\Big) = 0\\
m_D g + F_R - \frac{1}{2} m_B g = 0\\
F_R = g\Big(\frac{1}{2}m_B - m_D\Big)$$
which is the correct answer for ##F_R##. The problem comes when I try to find ##F_L## by using Newton's linear second law to eliminate ##F_R## and solve for ##F_L##. Doing so gives:
$$m_D g + m_D g - F_L - \frac{1}{2}m_B g = 0\\
F_L = 2m_D g - \frac{1}{2}m_B g\\
F_L = g\Big(2m_B - \frac{1}{2}m_B\Big)$$
which is the wrong answer for ##F_L##.

Likewise, I can also take the point of rotation to be around the right fulcrum:
$$(m_D g)\Big(\frac{2}{3}L\Big) - F_L\Big(\frac{L}{3}\Big) + (m_B g)\Big(\frac{L}{6}\Big) = 0\\
2m_D g - F_L + \frac{1}{2}m_B g = 0\\
F_L = g\Big(2m_D + \frac{1}{2}m_B\Big)$$
which is the correct answer for ##F_L##. However, if I use Newton's linear second law to eliminate ##F_L## and solve for ##F_R##, I get the wrong answer:
$$2m_D g - m_D g + F_R + \frac{1}{2}m_B g = 0\\
m_D g + F_R + \frac{1}{2}m_B g = 0\\
F_R = -g\Big(m_D + \frac{1}{2}m_B\Big)$$

Why do I get the wrong answer for ##F_L## and ##F_R## when I substitute Newton's linear second law into the known-correct answer for ##F_R## and ##F_L##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your static equilibrium equation for summed forces in the y direction is wrong. You are leaving out some forces. Watch your subscripts also for mb vs. md. And check your algebra.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Ah yes, I forgot the weight of the bar in Newton's linear second law. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
938
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K