Static friction in body with no intention to move

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of static friction when a block is pressed against a vertical wall with no intention to move. Participants explore the implications of static friction in this context, including the forces at play and the reaction from the wall. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects, practical implications, and potential experiments to investigate the phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that static friction opposes the imposed force until the limit is reached, suggesting that the wall would take on the remaining force after accounting for static friction.
  • Others argue that if the block cannot slide, the wall may take all the force, raising questions about the nature of the reaction force.
  • A participant mentions that in real systems, both the push force and static friction will exist, and the force at the wall will be the push force minus the static friction.
  • One participant calculates the limiting value of static friction and suggests that the reaction from the wall should be 190N, inviting experimental confirmation.
  • Another participant notes that the situation is statically indeterminate, questioning whether static friction can be assumed to be at its limiting value.
  • Some participants discuss the relevance of surface characteristics and coefficients of friction, suggesting that these factors may not influence the outcome under certain conditions.
  • There is a consensus that the scenario described has more unknowns than equations, indicating the need for additional information to solve it.
  • One participant highlights that until the block is pushed, there is no reaction force from the wall or friction, leading to uncertainty about which force acts first when the block is pushed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the behavior of static friction and the reaction force from the wall. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the exact nature of the forces involved or the conditions under which they apply.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the assumptions made about the system, including the dependence on material properties and the conditions under which static friction operates. There is also an acknowledgment of the complexities involved in real-world applications versus idealized models.

ash1262
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Suppose a block of mass 5 kg is resting on a horizontal surface and coefficient of static friction between block and surface is 0.2.

If the block is pushed against a vertical wall with a force of 200 N, will the static friction oppose the force? The body has no intention of moving as it is pressed against a wall.

What is the reaction on the block by the vertical wall?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction always opposes the motion; static friction opposes the imposed force - until the limit is reached. Then the coefficient will change.

If there was no friction the wall would constrain the block. Since there is friction, it must be taken into account.

Update: imagine a pressure sensor on the wall; when there is no friction it would give one reading (force applied / cross section area of the block). With friction the force appearing at the wall will be reduced by the frictional force opposing the motion).
 
Last edited:
UltrafastPED said:
Friction always opposes the motion; static friction opposes the imposed force - until the limit is reached. Then the coefficient will change.

If there was no friction the wall would constrain the block. Since there is friction, it must be taken into account.

Update: imagine a pressure sensor on the wall; when there is no friction it would give one reading (force applied / cross section area of the block). With friction the force appearing at the wall will be reduced by the frictional force opposing the motion).

I'm not so sure. If the block cannot even attempt to slide then it looks more like the wall takes all of the force. Perhaps someone with more knowledge than myself could answer this.
 
For real systems (i.e., not perfectly rigid) both forces will exist. The origin of friction are microscopic interactions at the interface between the materials ... these interactions exist independent of any lateral force ... thus the friction willl be apparent when the block is pushed.

Thus the presence of the wall is a secondary condition - the force at the wall will be the force of the push minus the force of the static friction.

Now consider what happens when the applied force exceeds the limits of the static coefficient of friction!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks, UltrafastPED and Drakkith.
In the case of the block, since the limiting value of the static friction is 5*10*0.2=10N, the reaction from the wall should be 190N.
I wonder if someone in the forum can conduct an experiment to confirm/demonstrate this phenomenon.
 
Experiments are left as homework for the student! :-)
 
Dear DaleSpam,
Does that mean that we can not assume that the static friction will be at the limiting value?
Thus, as the friction can take any value, the reaction from the wall is indeterminate?
Can we not rig up an experiment using different surfaces with different coefficients of friction, and measure the reaction from the wall, keeping the surface horizontal and the wall vertical?
 
ash1262 said:
Dear DaleSpam,
Does that mean that we can not assume that the static friction will be at the limiting value?
Thus, as the friction can take any value, the reaction from the wall is indeterminate?
Yes and yes.
Can we not rig up an experiment using different surfaces with different coefficients of friction, and measure the reaction from the wall, keeping the surface horizontal and the wall vertical?

We can, but it won't help. Consider that if the force pushing the block towards the wall is high enough, we could remove the floor and the block would still be fixed in place against the wall; that is, the characteristics of the floor including surface and coefficient of friction are irrelevant to the outcome under some conditions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
If you carefully review the Wikipedia article on statically indeterminate systems you will find this statement:
"Considerations in the material properties and compatibility in deformations are taken to solve statically indeterminate systems or structures."

This is why I took into consideration the microscopic origins of friction, and also discarded the "rigid body" idealization. And yes, a real experiment could be performed.
 
  • #11
UltrafastPED said:
And yes, a real experiment could be performed.

Agreed, a real experiment could be performed. But the scenario being described here does not pin down a set of conditions sufficiently so that all possible matching experiments would produce a similar definite outcome.

No real experiment can answer the question that is being asked. The correct answer is: "it depends".
 
  • #12
ash1262 said:
Does that mean that we can not assume that the static friction will be at the limiting value?
Thus, as the friction can take any value, the reaction from the wall is indeterminate?
Can we not rig up an experiment using different surfaces with different coefficients of friction, and measure the reaction from the wall, keeping the surface horizontal and the wall vertical?
It means that the system, as described, has more unknowns than equations. To solve it you need to get more equations. The additional equations come from the details of the shape and material properties.
 
  • #13
Until you push the block there is no reaction force from the wall, or from friction. So imagine you start pushing at t=0... Which kicks in first? The reaction force from the wall or the friction? It can't be determined.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K