Statics and equilibrium - asking for some guidance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving a statics problem involving forces at points A, B, and C in a physics context. The participant is attempting to calculate the forces F_A, F_B, and F_C, with expected values of 13.00 kN, 7.85 kN, and 9.88 kN, respectively. The participant's calculations involve setting up equilibrium equations using moments about points A and B, but they are encountering errors in their results. Key advice includes ensuring consistent sign conventions for forces and clarifying the relationships between the forces at points A and B.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles in physics
  • Familiarity with moment calculations and torque
  • Knowledge of vector components and force resolution
  • Ability to apply trigonometric functions in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of static equilibrium in physics
  • Study the method of resolving forces into components
  • Learn about the application of moment equations in statics
  • Practice solving similar statics problems with varying configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on statics and equilibrium, as well as educators looking for examples of problem-solving techniques in mechanics.

Finn J
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Template is shown
Hi,

I'm not used to communicate physics in English, so my language may be a bit off.

This task is fairly simplistic. It's a figure which is held up in points A and B (both having an x and y force exerted on them), and the figure has a joint C. It is depicted in attached files.

The answers are supposed to be F_A = 13,00 kN, F_B = 7,85 kN, F_C = 9,88 kN.

My results are erroneous.

Can anyone please give me some guidance?

Here's my process:

I separate A-C from B-C and get C with internal forces with equally large opposing forces.

Figure A-C:

Sigma M_A (clockwise is +) = 0

5*2 + 10*2 - 4*C_Ay + 4*C_Ax = 0

=> 30 - 4C_Ay + 4C_Ax = 0, this is (1)

Figure B-C:

Sigma M_B (clockwise is +) = 0

(- cos(arctan(3/4)) * 12 * 2,5) - (sin(arctan(3/4)) * 12 * (tan(arctan(3/4)) * 2,5)) - C_Bx * 3 - C_By *4 = 0

- 37,5 - 3C_Bx - 4 C_By = 0, this is (2)I find an expression for one of the missing values, and put this in the other formula.

And my result is wrong. Always wrong for these tasks. I must do some fundamental error. Any help will be appriciated.
2.jpg
2.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    30.6 KB · Views: 595
Physics news on Phys.org
Finn J said:
Sigma M_B (clockwise is +) = 0

- 37,5 - 3C_Bx - 4 C_By = 0, this is (2)

Why are you using negative signs in front of C_Bx and C_By?

Isn't the positive x-direction to the right and the positive y-direction upward?
 
Because C has internal forces and I assumed direction. Both of which work against momentum. On the other figure there's opposite forces in C. Or am I wrong?
 
Finn J said:
Because C has internal forces and I assumed direction. Both of which work against momentum. On the other figure there's opposite forces in C. Or am I wrong?
There are various ways to treat signs. If your mathematics is completely consistent then a variable representing an unknown force can be given the "wrong" sign and when you obtain it's value, it will be a negative number. The simplest way to be consistent is to give forces pointing in the positive x or y direction a "+" sign.

I find an expression for one of the missing values, and put this in the other formula.
How are you doing that? Are you setting C_Ax = C_Bx or are you setting C_Ax = - C_Bx ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
35K