Statics - beam forces and moments

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on analyzing beam forces and moments in statics problems, specifically addressing the confusion between "moment" and "momentum." Participants clarify that in statics, momentum is not involved, and the correct approach involves balancing forces and moments. The moment in the horizontal section is defined as P(b-x), and it is emphasized that starting the analysis from the end of the beam simplifies the process. A constant momentum of zero is established at the h section, reinforcing the importance of understanding the distinctions between these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statics principles
  • Familiarity with beam analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of force and moment balance
  • Ability to differentiate between moment and momentum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study beam analysis methods in statics
  • Learn about force and moment equilibrium in structural engineering
  • Explore cantilever beam theory and applications
  • Investigate common mistakes in statics problems, particularly regarding terminology
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those specializing in structural analysis, mechanics, and statics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of beam forces and moments.

almoga
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums and poster has been reminded to show their work
Summary:: I did the first section but I am having a hard time with the second. would like to find the moment in the next section (from b to h)

1626674809674.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think your momentum is right. The momentum in the top beam ranges from 0 at the corner to Pb at the wall, so pb+px can't be right, however you define x. (I don't see it on the drawing)
When analyzing a beam in wall/floor problem, it's usually easiest to start at the end of the beam. The section from h to the end is very simple, so you can also analyze the section from the cut in the top beam to the end at once. There really shouldn't be a problem if you set the total force and the momentum at any point at 0.
 
  • Like
Likes almoga
you were right about the b section. I corrected it. I ended up with a constant momentum of zero at the h section. does this make sense to you?
 
I think you can replace the vertical beam with a rope. There's only vertical forces, so how could there be a momentum?
 
willem2 said:
I don't think your momentum is right. The momentum in the top beam ranges from 0 at the corner to Pb at the wall
almoga said:
you were right about the b section. I corrected it. I ended up with a constant momentum of zero at the h section
If this is truly a statics problem, there is no momentum involved at all. There seems to be confusion between a "moment" and "momentum." They are quite different matters.
 
  • Like
Likes PhanthomJay
willem2 said:
I think you can replace the vertical beam with a rope. There's only vertical forces, so how could there be a momentum?
You need to balance forces and also moments.
 
The moment in the horizontal section is P(b-x). Basically, this is the same thing as a cantilever beam without the vertical section.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K