MHB Statics for rod attached to string

markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
View attachment 7415

View attachment 7416

could someone please explain to me why there is no relative force at point a where the rod ab is attached to a

thanks
 

Attachments

  • stats.png
    stats.png
    40.2 KB · Views: 103
  • sats 2.png
    sats 2.png
    30.6 KB · Views: 102
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
could someone please explain to me why there is no relative force at point a where the rod ab is attached to a

thanks

There is.
In the answer key it has been left out, since it's focusing on the moments about a.
The force at point a does not contribute to the moments about a.
 
thanks

I do not see how they can just resolve forces at point c horizontally and vertically. For these type of questions I was always told you can only resolve forces horizontally and vertically for the whole system not just 1 random point on the system. can you just resolve forces horizontally and vertically for 1 point on all types of questions like these.

I can also not see why/how they can take moments about point b for just point c. again I was always told when taking moments about a point you have to take all forces in the whole system about point c not just the forces at one point in the system.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top