Statics Problem 4/49: Method of Sections

  • Thread starter Thread starter ErLupo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Statics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a statics problem related to a loaded truss, specifically determining the force in member BE. Participants explore various methods to calculate angles and distances necessary for solving the problem, including the use of trigonometric relationships and the method of sections.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to sum moments and forces to find the force in member BE, expressing difficulty in determining the angle θ due to uncertainty about the horizontal distance between points B and F.
  • Another participant suggests solving triangle ABF to find the vertical distance between points A and B, hinting at the angle that line AB makes with the horizontal.
  • A participant calculates various distances and angles, including the hypotenuse BF and the horizontal distance BFx, but finds discrepancies in their results when calculating BE.
  • There is a discussion about the symmetry of the frame affecting the calculation of length FE, with one participant correcting another's assumption about the relationship between BC and BEx.
  • Participants debate the correct calculation of FE and its implications for finding angle θ, with one participant affirming the calculations of another while also pointing out potential errors in moment arm distances.
  • After revising the moment arms, one participant successfully recalculates Dy and Ay, ultimately arriving at a value for BE that matches the expected answer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the calculations leading to the final value of BE, but there are multiple competing views regarding the correct approach to determining distances and angles earlier in the discussion. The discussion reflects unresolved uncertainties about the geometry of the truss and the implications of symmetry.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential errors in the assumptions about distances and angles, as well as the dependence on the symmetry of the frame. Some calculations rely on specific geometric interpretations that may not be universally agreed upon.

ErLupo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the force in member BE of the loaded
truss.

Capture.PNG


See the attached picture.

Homework Equations


Sum of the Moments = 0
Sum of the Forces = 0
db294be8057ef5a33ecc90a182f9bab0.png


Inline7.gif
Inline8.gif
Inline9.gif


Inline10.gif
Inline11.gif
Inline12.gif


Inline13.gif
Inline14.gif
Inline15.gif


The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Sum moments about A to get:

-12L - 56L +40Dy = 0
Dy=1.7L

Sum the forces in the y direction:

Ay + Dy - L - 2L = 0
Ay = 1.3L

Cut through BC, BE, and FE at "Q"

Then sum the forces in the y direction:

-BEsin(θ) + Ay - L = 0
BE=.3L/sin(θ)

I'm really at a loss at how to get theta. The main problem I have is determining the horizontal distance between B and F. I am unable to determine what that distance is. If I had that distance I believe I could use the Law of sines and subsequently find theta.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The key is solving triangle ABF.

Can you figure the vertical distance between points A and B? (Hint: what angle does the line AB make with the horizontal?)
 
Wouldn't that just be;

Let x = vertical distance.

12/sin30 = y/sin60

y = 20.78.

That would make the hypotenuse = 24 (Pythagorean Theorem).

Then to solve for the hypotenuse BF of the small 15 degree triangle:

BF/sin15 = 24/sin120

BF = 7.17

Then to solve for the two legs joined at a right angle of the small 15 degree triangle:

Let BFx = horizontal distance between B and F.

BFx = 7.17*cos75°
BFx = 1.86

BFy = 7.17*sin75°
BFy = 6.93

To solve the right triangle with hypotenuse BE:

Horizontal distance between B and E
BEx = 16 - 1.86
BEx = 14.14

Now do inverse tangent to find the angle which is the same as theta:

θ = tan^-1(6.93/14.14)
θ = 26.1°

However, when I use that in my previous equation, BE=.3L/sin(θ), I come up with .682L which is off from the answer of .787L.

Any thoughts?
Thank you!
 
ErLupo said:
Wouldn't that just be;

Let x = vertical distance.

12/sin30 = y/sin60

y = 20.78.

That would make the hypotenuse = 24 (Pythagorean Theorem).

Then to solve for the hypotenuse BF of the small 15 degree triangle:

BF/sin15 = 24/sin120

BF = 7.17

Then to solve for the two legs joined at a right angle of the small 15 degree triangle:

Let BFx = horizontal distance between B and F.

BFx = 7.17*cos75°
BFx = 1.86

BFy = 7.17*sin75°
BFy = 6.93

I agree with your calculations up to this point. Good job.

To solve the right triangle with hypotenuse BE:

Horizontal distance between B and E
BEx = 16 - 1.86
BEx = 14.14

The calculation above is where the error crept into your calculations.

Notice that the frame is symmetrical about the vertical axis.
The length BC = 16 feet.

In order to find the length FE, you must use the symmetry of the frame to find the length of FE w.r.t. the length of BC.
Your calculation assumed FE = BC - BEx, which is slightly in error, because it corrects for only one side of the frame.
 
Yes, FE = BC - 2BEx, correct?

So that would make FE = 12.29

But if I were to use a right triangle with hypotenuse BE wouldn't I just add BEx which would be 14.14?

Even if I only use the actual length of FE (12.29) and a combination of law of sines and cosines to get the unknowns I still end up with an angle 26.1 degrees.
 
ErLupo said:
Yes, FE = BC - 2BEx, correct?

So that would make FE = 12.29

But if I were to use a right triangle with hypotenuse BE wouldn't I just add BEx which would be 14.14?

Just as point F is not located directly under point B along a vertical line, neither is point E located directly beneath point C. :wink:

Even if I only use the actual length of FE (12.29) and a combination of law of sines and cosines to get the unknowns I still end up with an angle 26.1 degrees.

BC = 16 ft.
FE' = 16 - 1.86 = 14.14 ft. (horizontal distance between B and E)

BF = 7.17 ft.

BF cos 15° = 6.93' (vertical distance between B and F)

∠FBE + 15° + θ = 90°

∠FBE = tan-1(14.14 / 6.93) - 15° = 48.9°

θ = 26.1°

I agree with your calculation of θ. :smile:

Looking back into your original calculations,

Sum moments about A to get:

-12L - 56L +40Dy = 0

Notice that the moment arms for the loads L and 2L don't quite line up with the distances measured to points B and C, respectively.

L and 2L are applied at points F and E instead. :frown:
 
Ah. Yes. This makes sense. That was my mistake.

When I use the changed distances to the moment arms I get Dy = 1.65L and Ay = 1.34L.

When the truss is cut through Q and the vertical forces are summed I got:

Ay - BEsin(θ) - L = 0

BE = (1.34L - L)/(sin(26.1°))

BE = .787L

Which matches the back of the book!

Thank you so much for the help!
 
Glad everything worked out! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
6K