Statics problem free body diagram

lc99
Messages
161
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


upload_2018-4-16_14-50-21.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2018-4-16_14-54-16.png


why are my reactions at A considered wrong? I know that AC and DC are two force-members
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-16_14-50-21.png
    upload_2018-4-16_14-50-21.png
    16.6 KB · Views: 1,502
  • upload_2018-4-16_14-54-16.png
    upload_2018-4-16_14-54-16.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 1,142
on Phys.org
I meant to post this on the physics homework forum if anyone can move it!
 
Here is more of my drawings...

upload_2018-4-16_15-19-41.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-16_15-19-41.png
    upload_2018-4-16_15-19-41.png
    44.6 KB · Views: 613
lc99 said:
I meant to post this on the physics homework forum if anyone can move it!

I think it is fine here. No need to move it. If you don't get any answers soon, click on my name and send me a message.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lc99
lc99 said:
why are my reactions at A considered wrong?
You are mixing up forces on different members. The reaction between the hinge at A and AB is independent of the reaction between that hinge and AC.
 
haruspex said:
You are mixing up forces on different members. The reaction between the hinge at A and AB is independent of the reaction between that hinge and AC.

What do you mean by independent? I'm not sure if i am understanding. :(

For the reaction between hinge A and AB, you have Ax and Ay. for the reacting between hinge A and AC, you have Fac from the two force member.

are both of my drawings wrong?
 
Last edited:
lc99 said:
For the reaction between hinge A and AB, you have Ax and Ay. for the reacting between hinge A and AC, you have Fac from the two force member.
Yes, but you have included Fac on the free body diagram for AB.
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but you have included Fac on the free body diagram for AB.
isnt that right? the member AC has force on AB
 
lc99 said:
isnt that right? the member AC has force on AB
No, this is my point about their independence. Each spar is tied to the joint independently of the other. It would be exactly the same if they were tied to different joints that happened to be at the same point.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
No, this is my point about their independence. Each spar is tied to the joint independently of the other. It would be exactly the same if they were tied to different joints that happened to be at the same point.

so it should just be Ax and Ay?
 
  • #11
lc99 said:
so it should just be Ax and Ay?
Yes.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
Yes, but you have included Fac on the free body diagram for AB.
Would it be wrong if i leave Ax and Ay off except Fac? If it is, then whenever i see a two force member and a pin together on one joint, i only draw the Ax and Ay?

Do i leave Fac off because Fac is a reaction force to the pins Ax,Ay?
 
  • #13
lc99 said:
Would it be wrong if i leave Ax and Ay off except Fac? If it is, then whenever i see a two force member and a pin together on one joint, i only draw the Ax and Ay?

Do i leave Fac off because Fac is a reaction force to the pins Ax,Ay?
There is not (or does not need to be) any force between AB and AC. They just happen to be connected to the same hinge. So the free body diagram for one should ignore the presence of the other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K