Stationary Waves - Effect of Frequency and Amplitude

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the creation of stationary waves using a spreadsheet to simulate waves moving in opposite directions. Participants explored the effects of varying amplitude and wavelength on wave behavior, concluding that different amplitudes lead to non-zero displacement during destructive interference, while differing frequencies prevent the formation of simple standing waves. The consensus emphasizes that coherent waves with identical frequency and amplitude are necessary to achieve a standing wave, resulting in a clear, observable pattern.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave properties, including amplitude and wavelength.
  • Familiarity with the concept of constructive and destructive interference.
  • Knowledge of wave coherence and its role in wave interactions.
  • Basic proficiency in using spreadsheet software for simulations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of wave interference and its mathematical representation.
  • Explore the concept of wave coherence in detail, focusing on its implications for wave interactions.
  • Learn about advanced wave simulation techniques using software like MATLAB or Python.
  • Investigate the effects of varying wave parameters on standing wave formation in different mediums.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching wave mechanics, and anyone interested in the practical applications of wave theory and simulations.

Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

As part of my Physics Class, we created a spreadsheet that animates to waves moving in opposite directions to illustrate standing waves. In order to test we were told to put the same values of amplitude, wavelength and speed (frequency was calculated from wavelength and speed) for both waves.

Our assignment was to try different values for amplitude and wavelength (to change the frequency) for each wave and to describe the effect. For some reason however, excel goes crazy and it is hard to observe the effect after changing these variables.

Even though the animation is not working I wanted to submit my predictions. I am not very sure, but this is what I think would happen:

If we have different amplitudes for each wave and pick equal values for wavelength and frequency for each wave I think that, during constructive interference, the resulting amplitude would add as it did before but during destructive interference, instead of having a node at 0 displacement we would have a node at negative displacement.

For different frequencies for each wave, I don't see how it would work because, from what I understand, it only works when the two waves are coherent, correct?

Thanks,
Peter G.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter G. said:
Hi,

As part of my Physics Class, we created a spreadsheet that animates to waves moving in opposite directions to illustrate standing waves. In order to test we were told to put the same values of amplitude, wavelength and speed (frequency was calculated from wavelength and speed) for both waves.

Our assignment was to try different values for amplitude and wavelength (to change the frequency) for each wave and to describe the effect. For some reason however, excel goes crazy and it is hard to observe the effect after changing these variables.

Even though the animation is not working I wanted to submit my predictions. I am not very sure, but this is what I think would happen:

If we have different amplitudes for each wave and pick equal values for wavelength and frequency for each wave I think that, during constructive interference, the resulting amplitude would add as it did before but during destructive interference, instead of having a node at 0 displacement we would have a node at negative displacement.

For different frequencies for each wave, I don't see how it would work because, from what I understand, it only works when the two waves are coherent, correct?

Thanks,
Peter G.

With different amplitudes, you will certainly not get a zero for destructive interference, though I am not sure why you said it would be negative?

With different wavelengths [frequencies if you like] you certainly won't get a simple standing wave.
 
Oh, yes, I got confused on the negative part. But it is correct to say that we would not get 0 displacement for standing waves with contrasting amplitudes?
 
Peter G. said:
Oh, yes, I got confused on the negative part. But it is correct to say that we would not get 0 displacement for standing waves with contrasting amplitudes?

The more I think about it the less I like it.

If you have two waves traveling in opposite directions on a single string, they will form a, generally, complex interaction.

In one very special case, we get an interaction which is simple to analyse and observe.

If , and only if, the two waves have the same frequency [wavelength] and amplitude we get what is called a standing wave - which looks like segments of the string flopping backwards and forwards in a transverse way with no motion along the string - it is standing still.

In the absence of that one specific set of conditions, I suspect there will be no standing wave, but a complex interaction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K