Statistical mechanics - Partition function of a system of N particles

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the partition function for a system of N distinguishable particles, each of which can occupy one of two energy states: -ε and +ε. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the correct formulation of the partition function and the summation involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the partition function but questions the validity of their approach, particularly regarding the summation over energy states. Other participants suggest reviewing standard examples from thermodynamics and clarify the nature of the summation involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's confusion, offering guidance on the correct interpretation of the summation in the context of the partition function. There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts involved, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of correctly identifying whether the summation is over energy states or microstates, which is a point of contention in the discussion. Additionally, references to textbooks suggest a need for further reading on the topic.

Jalo
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Imagine a system with N distinguishable particles. Each particle may be in two states of energy: -ε and +ε.

Find the the partition function of the system

Homework Equations



2acad120bcee798b08a9cdfca4db8451.png


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that I have to find the partition function for a single function, Z, and my final result will be ZN. Now, I'll say that:

(Where it says ε it's meant to be ε(r) )

Z = Ʃr exp(-β(ε - ε) ) = Ʃr exp(-βε) * exp(βε) =
= Ʃr exp(-βε) * Ʃr exp(βε)



I'm sure this is incorrect. It doesn't make sense in my head.. E(r) is the energy associated with each microstate, therefore saying that E(r) = ε(r) - ε(r) can't make any sense! I know that the result is:

Z = ( exp(βε) + exp(-βε) )N

I have no idea how to get there tho. How did it became a sum? How do I get rid of the summatories?

Any help will be appreciated!
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The partition function is a summation over states. You simply are using the summation wrong. It is not a summation over the energy levels of within the exponent. It is a summation over e(-Es/T).
 
Look at any example problem in a thermo book for a 2-state system
 
8ikmAm I not summing over the expoent of the energy of each microstate?

klawlor419 said:
Look at any example problem in a thermo book for a 2-state system

Do you know any good statistical mechanics book you'd advise me reading?

EDIT:
Is it a summation over all the states of energy instead of the energies of each microstate? Because then the solution would make sense!
 
Last edited:
Jalo said:
Am I not summing over the expoent of the energy of each microstate?



Do you know any good statistical mechanics book you'd advise me reading?

No. You are summing over the exponential function raised to the -Es/T.

A good book is Thermal Physics by Kittel + Kroemer
 
Where Es is the energy of the s-th state
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
767
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K