Statistical Thermo Grad Course: Advice on Math, Fuel Cell vs Solar?

AI Thread Summary
A statistical thermodynamics graduate course requires a solid understanding of algebra, calculus, and basic statistics, with classical thermodynamics serving as a helpful foundation. While knowledge of quantum mechanics is beneficial, it plays a minor role in statistical mechanics, so a quarter's worth of QM is generally sufficient. The distinction between engineering and physics thermodynamics is significant; engineering focuses on practical applications, while physics delves deeper into theoretical aspects. For specialization in fuel cell development or solar thermolic processes, taking an electrochemistry course next semester is advisable. Overall, a strong grasp of thermodynamic principles is crucial for success in the course.
Topher925
Messages
1,562
Reaction score
7
I'm planning on taking a statistical thermodynamics grad course this Fall. Being an ME I am very familiar with classical thermo but what other topics should I be keen on? Any specific field of mathematics like abstract alg(only math I have not taken) I should be worried about?

Also, I am planning on specializing in fuel cell development or solar thermolic processes, I can't decide. Any insight on this decision and should I plan on taking a course in electrochemistry next semester as well? I'm going to a small school(read not high ranked) and they will let me take just about anything related to my field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
advanced calculus and statistics, Knowing quantum would help also
 
Eh, Iv already taken all levels of those courses and know them fairly well. I do need to learn more about quantum though. Should I be looking at relative or non-relative quantum?
 
non-relavistic qm, don't worry about qm to much it only plays a small role in stat mech. Know your thermodynamics relationships really well.
 
Topher925 said:
I'm planning on taking a statistical thermodynamics grad course this Fall. Being an ME I am very familiar with classical thermo

Totally different.

But it doesn't matter, because the approach is fairly simple. All you have to be good at is algebra, calculus, some statistics (like one quarter's worth), thermo will help, and some good hand-waving skills are necessary. Most of the derivations just leave me going "Wait, what just happened?"

Knowing 1 quarter of QM is also good.

Besides that you'll be fine.

Do you know what book you'll be using?
 
Thanks for the advice. No, I don't know the text yet. But the professor that teaches it is fricken awesome. The course description says that a large part of the class is a review of thermodynamics. Is thermodynamics in physics really that different from thermo for engineers? I mean, the four laws are the four laws right?
 
thermodynamics is the same for everyone, but statistical thermodynamics is a whole different game. It can reduce to regular thermo, but it plays at a much, much lower level.
 
tmc said:
thermodynamics is the same for everyone

No, it is definitely NOT the same for everyone.

Thermo for engineers is drastically different than thermo for physics. Engineering thermo doesn't go into theory as much, but it's designed so that you can actually use it in a real setting. Physics thermodynamics is a joke in that regard, because you assume everything is perfect essentially.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top