Statistics of radioactive decay

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 2K views
jdou86
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
GRE
Relevant Equations
GRE PHysics
Screen Shot 2019-09-02 at 8.37.00 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Same as in the other thread, you'll have to show what you did so far.
I extended the title to be more descriptive of the problem statement.

If you have a measurement, e.g. 100 counts in 7 seconds, what will your uncertainty on the rate be?
 
10 since since sigma is sqrt of N so I set sqrtN/N=0.1 but that didn't get me very far
 
jdou86 said:
10 since since sigma is sqrt of N so I set sqrtN/N=0.1 but that didn't get me very far
Well, that is an important step already. An uncertainty of 10 is an uncertainty of 10% here. Too much, you'll need more counts to get to 1%...
 
Vanadium 50 said:
These problems take longer than a second to solve. Why don't you write down your strategy for solving this. In words.
I'm good thanks
 
mfb said:
Well, that is an important step already. An uncertainty of 10 is an uncertainty of 10% here. Too much, you'll need more counts to get to 1%...
Sorry it's supposed to be 0.01 but it still won't make sense because 10,000 counts represents 1000s measurement.
 
jdou86 said:
Sorry it's supposed to be 0.01 but it still won't make sense because 10,000 counts represents 1000s measurement.
My desperate attempt whcih matches the answer
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20190903_013258.jpg
    IMG_20190903_013258.jpg
    42 KB · Views: 214
10000 counts is correct. You can use the existing measurements to get a rough estimate of the decay rate and use that to get the time you need to accumulate 10000 counts.