Statistics - Standard Deviation, Standard Error and Mean

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the average of four numbers from a set of six in Excel can be challenging, especially when aiming to exclude outliers. Instead of manually selecting numbers, one can compute the average for all combinations of four numbers and find the expected value of these averages. Using robust statistics, such as the median and median absolute deviation (MAD), can provide a more reliable measure of central tendency and variability in skewed distributions. Visual representations like dot plots or stemplots may also help in understanding the data better. Focusing on robust methods rather than arbitrary exclusions will yield more accurate results.
Learn
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Just had a question regarding statistical analysis.

I'm trying to calculate the average of 4 numbers from a data set of 6 numbers in excel without manually choosing to average only the 4 numbers.

e.g.


85 20 32 45 27 3 (total mean = 35.3 desired mean = 31)
100 30 27 40 21 1
...etc

The middle 4 numbers represent a more realistic result whilst the two end numbers are irrelevant.

I've tried looking into weighted averages however I'm unsure how to apply this to an excel sheet.

I'd prefer to find a formula which would discount numbers which vary wildly from the average amount and focus only on the few that don't.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have six numbers - if you picked four of them at random, what would be their average?
That about it?

Clearly that depends on the four numbers - but you can work out each possible combination of 4, and work out the average for each one. The expectation value of the averages will be your answer.
 
A better strategy than excluding observations arbitrarily would be to compute "robust" estimates of the distribution, e.g. the median instead of the mean and the median absolute deviation (MAD) as an estimator for the variability.
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robust_statistics
 
As a general comment, to reinfoce what was already said, in distributions that are not symmetrical or not unimodal, and or distributions with outliers, the variance is not a good measure of spread. You may also want to represent your data with a dot plot or stemplot:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stem-and-leaf_plot
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top