Statistics: variable transformation proof?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the relationship between random variables Y and X, specifically when Y is defined as a transformation of X, denoted as Y = u(X). The user seeks clarification on how to demonstrate that the probability distribution of Y, g(y), relates to the distribution of X, f(x), through the inverse function w. A key point highlighted is the importance of the one-to-one nature of the transformation; if u is not monotonic, the relationship becomes more complex. The conversation emphasizes that understanding the mapping and its implications on probability distributions is crucial for accurate proof. The thread concludes with an acknowledgment of the need for careful evaluation in cases of non-monotonic functions.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27

Homework Statement


Ok this might be a stupid question, but:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t31/q77/s720x720/10001118_10202561443653973_1625797585_o.jpg
Why is this the case? I think for all of this to be right, then the assumption of ##Y=u(X) \Leftrightarrow y=u(x)##. But how do I prove this?

The Attempt at a Solution



An attempt: OK, assume ##X## has a probability distribution given by ##f(x)##, and ##Y=2X## has a probability distribution of ##g(x)##. Then if ##Y = u(X)##, with w being the inverse one-on-one function of u, ##P(X=x) = P(w(Y)=x) = P(Y=u(x))=P(Y=y=u(x))##.

This is as far as I got, but now I am confused. What to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're almost there. Note by definition that

g(y) = P\{Y = y\}

and you must prove that

g(y) = f(w(y))

which is by definition

f(w(y)) = P\{X = w(y)\}

So you must somehow find why

P\{Y = y\} = P\{X=w(y)\}
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
OK, I see. Thanks for the help :)
 
Nikitin said:

Homework Statement


Ok this might be a stupid question, but:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t31/q77/s720x720/10001118_10202561443653973_1625797585_o.jpg
Why is this the case? I think for all of this to be right, then the assumption of ##Y=u(X) \Leftrightarrow y=u(x)##. But how do I prove this?

The Attempt at a Solution



An attempt: OK, assume ##X## has a probability distribution given by ##f(x)##, and ##Y=2X## has a probability distribution of ##g(x)##. Then if ##Y = u(X)##, with w being the inverse one-on-one function of u, ##P(X=x) = P(w(Y)=x) = P(Y=u(x))=P(Y=y=u(x))##.

This is as far as I got, but now I am confused. What to do?

You already got the answer below, but just to clarify: the one-to-one assumption is crucial. If you had a non-monotone function, such as ##u(x) = x^2##, and if the range of ##X## included both positive and negative values, then the mapping ##Y = u(X)## might not be 1:1, and so you might need a more complicated evaluation of ##P(Y = y)##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K