Statistics: Verifying a Probability Proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around verifying a probability proof using Venn diagrams and algebraic reasoning. Participants are exploring how to demonstrate the equivalence of probabilities in a given theorem context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are considering the effectiveness of using diagrams for the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) of the equation to verify the proof. There is discussion about whether this visual approach would suffice or if additional algebraic arguments are necessary.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested that while diagrams may not constitute a formal proof, they could aid in understanding the equivalence of the probabilities. Others have proposed that incorporating algebraic expressions related to the variables a, b, and c could strengthen the argument.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific variables (a, b, c) and their relationships, as well as the requirement for the proof to meet certain standards. The discussion also references the complement of a set in probability, indicating a focus on set relationships.

lema21
Messages
18
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Referring to figure 6, verify that P(A∩B')= P(A)-P(A∩B).
Relevant Equations
I have no idea how to start the solution and I've been looking on the web for similar questions but to no avail.
Untitled.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea how to start the solution
doesn't pass the PF requirements to get assistance, but what the heck: you have a Venn diagram, so colour the appropriate areas !
 
Would drawing the diagrams for the LHS and RHS be enough to verify?
 
lema21 said:
Would drawing the diagrams for the LHS and RHS be enough to verify?

It probably wouldn't qualify as a proof, but it would help show you why the probabilities are equivalent. Adding an algebraic argument in terms of a, b and c as in the proof you provided of Theorem 1, would count as a proof.
 
lema21 said:
Would drawing the diagrams for the LHS and RHS be enough to verify?
Hint: if ##a = b - c## then ##a + c = b##.
 
I assume by B' you mean the compliment of B.

Looking at the diagram what is
P(A∩B')=?
P(A)=?
P(A∩B)=?
Give the answers in terms of a,b,c. Then you will see that the equation we want to prove transforms to something that algebraically is almost obvious.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
953
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K