Stats: figuring out ranges of transformed variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter bennyska
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stats Variables
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the range of transformed variables in statistics, specifically focusing on functions such as f(x) = 4x³ and transformations like U = (X - 0.5)². Participants express difficulty in understanding how to find the range of these transformed variables, particularly when the transformations do not appear to be straightforward.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for finding the range of transformed variables, including plugging in values and considering maximum and minimum outputs. There is uncertainty about whether this approach is sufficient, especially for non-one-to-one functions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the relationship between the transformations and their ranges, while others are still grappling with the implications of non-one-to-one transformations. The conversation reflects a mix of understanding and confusion, with some guidance provided but no clear consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the transformations being discussed involve continuous functions and that there are concerns about how to handle ranges when the functions are not one-to-one. There is also mention of specific examples and the need to consider the characteristics of the graphs involved.

bennyska
Messages
110
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


so in general, i am having difficulty in figuring out the range of a transformed variable. sometimes it's easy, i just plug in values and get the other values out, but sometimes I'm not seeing it. for example:
f(x)=4x3, for 0<x<1
and let U = (X-.5)2. Finding the pdf of U was not difficult, but finding the range is. the book says 0<u<.25.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i can see that if i plug in 0 for x, i get .25, and if i plug in 1 for x, i get .25. i guess, in this range, i can see that the max is .25 and the min is 0. in general, is that how i find it? just take the min and max? that doesn't seem right to me.

another example would be with f(x) = 1, and let Y = X(1-X). finding the pdf wasn't too difficult, but again I'm having problem with the range. actually, the book gives the same answer, and the graph is pretty similar, just rotated. so, really, i don't know where to get the ranges.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bennyska said:

Homework Statement


so in general, i am having difficulty in figuring out the range of a transformed variable. sometimes it's easy, i just plug in values and get the other values out, but sometimes I'm not seeing it. for example:
f(x)=4x3, for 0<x<1
and let U = (X-.5)2. Finding the pdf of U was not difficult, but finding the range is. the book says 0<u<.25.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i can see that if i plug in 0 for x, i get .25, and if i plug in 1 for x, i get .25. i guess, in this range, i can see that the max is .25 and the min is 0. in general, is that how i find it? just take the min and max? that doesn't seem right to me.
This is actually pretty straightforward. Just work through the inequalities.

You are given that 0 < x < 1,
so -.5 < x - .5 < .5,
If you square x - .5 (to get u), you will always get something that is >= 0, so you have
0 <= (x - .5)2 < (.5)2

or 0 <= u < .25
bennyska said:
another example would be with f(x) = 1, and let Y = X(1-X). finding the pdf wasn't too difficult, but again I'm having problem with the range. actually, the book gives the same answer, and the graph is pretty similar, just rotated. so, really, i don't know where to get the ranges.
 
bennyska said:

Homework Statement


so in general, i am having difficulty in figuring out the range of a transformed variable. sometimes it's easy, i just plug in values and get the other values out, but sometimes I'm not seeing it. for example:
f(x)=4x3, for 0<x<1
and let U = (X-.5)2. Finding the pdf of U was not difficult, but finding the range is. the book says 0<u<.25.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i can see that if i plug in 0 for x, i get .25, and if i plug in 1 for x, i get .25. i guess, in this range, i can see that the max is .25 and the min is 0. in general, is that how i find it? just take the min and max? that doesn't seem right to me.

another example would be with f(x) = 1, and let Y = X(1-X). finding the pdf wasn't too difficult, but again I'm having problem with the range. actually, the book gives the same answer, and the graph is pretty similar, just rotated. so, really, i don't know where to get the ranges.

Look at the graph of y = (x - .5)2. What range of y-values is obtained from the x-interval 0 <= x <= 1?

RGV
 
thanks, mark, that's totally obvious now that you put it out there.
i'm still having a little trouble with the next one, though.
0<x<1
0<x(1-x)<(1-x)
0<u<1-x... solving for x in terms u doesn't really seem to work. in short, i don't see how i can rid of that x and get .25 on that side...

ray: so is that all i have to do? if i look at the graph of the function I'm using to transform, and it's continuous, all i have to do is take the max and min? that seems wrong to me, since it's not one to one, but i really don't know.
 
Yes, to get the *range* that's all you have to do. It is true that (x-.5)^2 does not have an inverse, but that is a separate issue (which you must address when computing the _distribution_ of Y, but not when getting the range of Y).

RGV
 
Last edited:
For the 2nd problem, if u = x(1 - x), the graph of this equation is a parabola that opens down. The two x-intercepts are pretty easy to find, and the vertex is also easy to find. Once you know the coordinates of the vertex, finding the range of values of u is straightforward.
 
so i guess it makes sense that the min and max of the function I'm transforming is the range. it just seems weird to me because it's not one to one. but if you have to incorporate that fact elsewhere, then I'm more okay with it. it just seemed like i was leaving information out. thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K