Stenography (shorthand) techniques

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Is Hard
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relevance and usage of shorthand, particularly the Gregg method, which was commonly taught to secretaries and journalists decades ago for efficient note-taking and transcription. Participants express curiosity about whether shorthand is still practiced today, with many noting it seems to be a lost art. Some share personal experiences of learning shorthand or similar systems, like "compressed writing," and how they adapted these techniques for modern note-taking. The conversation also touches on the decline of cursive writing skills among younger generations, comparing it to the fading knowledge of shorthand. There is a consensus that effective note-taking often relies on the ability to discern key information rather than strictly adhering to shorthand methods. Overall, the thread highlights nostalgia for traditional writing techniques and concerns about their diminishing presence in contemporary education.
Math Is Hard
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,650
Reaction score
39
When I was in high school, I picked up some stenography (shorthand) techniques:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shorthand

My grandmother was pretty adept at the Gregg method of shorthand, and she taught me some of it. It was a pretty common thing for secretaries and journalists to know 20 or 30 years ago. It allowed them to take dictation or create transcripts quickly and efficiently. It was a fairly complex system, but sometimes helpful for note taking in my classes.

I am curious if people still use these systems - or is it a lost art? I don't know anyone who even remembers it.

Also, do you use your own invented shorthand systems for taking notes in lectures?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


At AT&T they taught us "compressed writing", back in the 70's. It was the original "txt spk". I still use it when writing personal notes.
 


Evo said:
At AT&T they taught us "compressed writing", back in the 70's. It was the original "txt spk". I still use it when writing personal notes.

That's interesting. I had not heard of that. Was it mostly vowel elimination and some phonetic spelling?

The system I learned was phonetically based, but there were symbols that replaced the sounds. They were meant to be combined into more complex symbols, sometimes in odd (but quick) ways.
 


math is hard said:
when i was in high school, i picked up some stenography (shorthand) techniques:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/shorthand

my grandmother was pretty adept at the gregg method of shorthand, and she taught me some of it. It was a pretty common thing for secretaries and journalists to know 20 or 30 years ago. It allowed them to take dictation or create transcripts quickly and efficiently. It was a fairly complex system, but sometimes helpful for note taking in my classes.

I am curious if people still use these systems - or is it a lost art? I don't know anyone who even remembers it.

Also, do you use your own invented shorthand systems for taking notes in lectures?

tl;dr
 


Math Is Hard said:
That's interesting. I had not heard of that. Was it mostly vowel elimination and some phonetic spelling?

The system I learned was phonetically based, but there were symbols that replaced the sounds. They were meant to be combined into more complex symbols, sometimes in odd (but quick) ways.
Mostly vowel elimination and acronyms. A sentence would be "sub ci, dnk, ret cl, ni, lw" meant "customer called in and denied all knowledge of the problem, I returned their call but they weren't in so I left a message."
 


By the time I finished high school, I was typing 35 wpm, and in college that rose to more than 50. Wouldn't have helped much, though as we didn't have laptops back then, and the IBM PC portable was a clunker!
 


When I was in high school, I took a class in "notehand" which was/is a sort of simplified version of Gregg shorthand. After a while, I stopped trying to use "pure" notehand, but continued to use some of the symbols as abbreviations when taking class notes in college.
 


Math Is Hard said:
When I was in high school, I picked up some stenography (shorthand) techniques:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shorthand

My grandmother was pretty adept at the Gregg method of shorthand, and she taught me some of it. It was a pretty common thing for secretaries and journalists to know 20 or 30 years ago. It allowed them to take dictation or create transcripts quickly and efficiently. It was a fairly complex system, but sometimes helpful for note taking in my classes.

I am curious if people still use these systems - or is it a lost art? I don't know anyone who even remembers it.

Also, do you use your own invented shorthand systems for taking notes in lectures?

Wow - what a blast from the past. I checked out your wiki link, above. A couple of decades ago, I was in awe of a secretary of mine who could do this, and had actually finished writing, more often than not, before I had finished speaking - no matter how fast.

On the wiki link, is a copy of 'The Lords Prayer' in shorthand. Here's what I found interesting about it (on a rough and ready calculation);

The amount of symbols / material, appears to me to be no less than the amount had it been written in 'normal' hand. Strange, that - doesn't look too 'shorthand' after all !
 
  • #10


I would abbreviate and condense when I took notes, so I could keep up without shorthand. I took typing in HS, though, knowing that if I could save and buy a typewriter, I could type all my papers, and maybe pick up a few bucks here and there typing papers for other students. I talked two other guys into taking the course, too, just so I wouldn't be the only guy in the course. The instructor was 5-foot nothin' and pretty as can be, so talking them into the course was easy. Because of us 3, the class exceeded the normal size, and we (guys only) had to use older manual typewriters while the girls got the electrics. Still, we usually came in 1,2,3 in the speed/accuracy drills. The instructor loved to give the girls a hard time about that.
 
  • #11


Math Is Hard said:
When I was in high school, I picked up some stenography (shorthand) techniques:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shorthand

My grandmother was pretty adept at the Gregg method of shorthand, and she taught me some of it. It was a pretty common thing for secretaries and journalists to know 20 or 30 years ago. It allowed them to take dictation or create transcripts quickly and efficiently. It was a fairly complex system, but sometimes helpful for note taking in my classes.

I am curious if people still use these systems - or is it a lost art? I don't know anyone who even remembers it.

Also, do you use your own invented shorthand systems for taking notes in lectures?

I learned it when I was about 9 years old. But that was 42 years ago. So I guess that doesn't count.

Though I think it had an effect on how I write. When writing out checks(the only time I use cursive anymore), I use no leading tails. For example, my lowercase i's and t's don't include the initial upstroke, so it looks like half of it is missing. The only exception to this rule would be lowercase L's. It also affected my printing. My uppercase printed E's look like backwards 3's or uppercase cursive E's. This so infuriated one of my supervisors in the past that he would go over all of my documents and square them all off. Talk about OCD.

But as with everything you don't use, I've forgotten all of my shorthand. And that's why I purposely bought a digital camera that could record 8 hours of audio.
 
  • #12


Proton Soup said:

I never learned shorthand. In fact, the most important part of note taking was learning how to decide what was important enough to write down.

I was shocked to find out how few people today know how to write every letter in cursive.

I wonder which is more common: not knowing how to write in cursive or not knowing the multiplication tables?

Then vs. now:

What was said:

Hey, sugar, can you call Mr Riley over at CTMC and set up a meeting for Friday? It can't be before 9:00 and I have a meeting Bradley over at Landtech Conglomerates at 2:00, but, to be honest, I'm not going to mind having an excuse to miss that one. He's a moron and I feel like I'll be wasting my entire afternoon if I have to listen to his ramblings. And, hey hon, try not to schedule it during lunch, since I'd kind of like to bang you over my desk, if you know what I mean. Hot, hot dress, by the way.

Then: Set mtg w Riley, CTMC for 2 Friday. Call Bradley, LC to cx mtg.

Now: Meet with lawyer on Friday 2:00 PM to discuss sexual harrassment lawsuit. "Hey, sugar...";"Hey, hon... I'd ... like to bang you over my desk"; "Hot, hot dress"
 
  • #13


I think that's exactly how it would go, Bob! :)
 
  • #14


Count me among those who took shorthand (Gregg style) in high school. It came in handy for lectures in h.s. and
college. Yes it is phonetic representation of words. As such, it could be extended to use in other languages.
I used a combination of shorthand, simple abbreviations and longhand for taking notes.
Also, as BobG mentions, with experience you just learn what is important enough
to write down and what is extraneous.

Those who have mentioned typing, I learned typing on both manual and electric and typed 60wpm. in high school.
Dad typed 100wpm in the service (US Navy). I found it interesting, to be able to carry on a conversation and simultaneously
type accurately. Evidently the eye-to-hand neural pathway is separate from the ear-to-mouth pathway.
Similarly when I am playing a song on the guitar, I can hold a conversation at the same time.
 
Last edited:
  • #15


Ouabache said:
Similarly when I am playing a song on the guitar, I can hold a conversation at the same time.
Same here, though for some reason, I have trouble doing a decent job singing while playing bass, though singing while playing lead or rhythm guitar was never an issue. Props to Jack Bruce and Sting for pulling that off. Maybe I'm just wired differently. I have never been able to do a decent job singing while playing drums, either, so there might be some linkage there. I CAN sing along with drums or bass, just not well enough to suit me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
145
Replies
4
Views
603
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Back
Top