Stiffness factor for member in beam

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 4K views
fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


In this question , I don't understand why the KBC is 4EI / L ...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I was told that for the far end pinned or roller supported , the K = 3EI / L , so shouldn't the KBC = 3EI / L.. Is the author wrong ?

In the 3rd photo , we can see that for far end pinned supported , k = 3EI / L , not 4EI / L
 

Attachments

  • P861M.png
    P861M.png
    37.6 KB · Views: 843
  • vRd8Z.png
    vRd8Z.png
    45.2 KB · Views: 698
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
fonseh said:
for the far end pinned or roller supported , the K = 3EI / L , so shouldn't the KBC = 3EI / L.. Is the author wrong ?
BC is only a segment of the beam ABCD. The "far end" of BC from B is D.
Think about it: if D were just a pin then the beam could rotate a bit about D, allowing it equally to rotate a little about C. But with D fixed, it is much harder for there to be any rotation about C.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
haruspex said:
BC is only a segment of the beam ABCD. The "far end" of BC from B is D.
Think about it: if D were just a pin then the beam could rotate a bit about D, allowing it equally to rotate a little about C. But with D fixed, it is much harder for there to be any rotation about C.
So , in this problem , the far end of AB is D , as D s pinned , so the KAB is 3EI / L ? If D is fixed , then KAB would be 4EI / L ?
 

Attachments

  • 583.png
    583.png
    80.5 KB · Views: 1,680
fonseh said:
So , in this problem , the far end of AB is D , as D s pinned , so the KAB is 3EI / L ? If D is fixed , then KAB would be 4EI / L ?
That's my understanding. But please bear in mind that my entire knowledge of the subject comes from the textbook extracts you have posted.
 
haruspex said:
That's my understanding. But please bear in mind that my entire knowledge of the subject comes from the textbook extracts you have posted.
May I know which part ? Can you highlighted it ?
 
fonseh said:
May I know which part ? Can you highlighted it ?
I have not noticed an actual definition of "far end" but just thinking about how I would expect a beam to behave it is clear that if any part of a beam is unable to rotate at all it will make the beam stiffer at all joints. Hence that is how I interpret the term.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh