Stoichiometry Gold III hydroxide

  • Thread starter Thread starter MichaelXY
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gold Stoichiometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the preparation and stoichiometry of gold III hydroxide from KAuCl4 and sodium carbonate. A balanced chemical equation is provided, highlighting the conversion of carbonate to carbon dioxide during the reaction. The participant struggles with identifying the limiting reactant and calculating percent yield, ultimately determining a yield of 80.45%. Clarifications are offered regarding the decomposition of carbonate and the proper method for identifying limiting reactants. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding stoichiometric relationships in chemical reactions.
MichaelXY
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This problem is giving me trouble on many levels.
Gold III hydroxide is used for electroplating gold onto other metals. It can be made from the reaction of KAuCl4 (aq) with sodium carbonate and water.

a. Write a balanced equation for this reaction.

b. To prepare a fresh supply of gold III hydroxide, a chemist makes 20.00g of the KAuCl4 with 25.00 g of the sodium carbonate. What is the percent yield if the actual amount of gold III hydroxide produced in the reaction is 10.56g?




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Part (a) is my first difficult spot, I was able to come up with

NaCO3 + KAuCl4 + H2O -------> So I figure Au(OH)3 + KCL + CO3, before balancing
But the correct answer is:
3NaCO3 +2KAuCl4+3H20----> 2Au(OH)3 +2KCL+CO2 +6NACl

My first problem was that I do not see how we went from CO3 to CO2, second since CO3 and CO2 are polyatomics, how do we balance.

So I then went on to work the problem.
20 g KAuCl4 = .05292 moles
25 g NaCO3 = .301 mole

So since KAuCL4 is the smaller amount do I say that is the limiting factor? Assuming I am correct, I compute:

20 g KAuCl4 (1 mole KAUCl4/377.877g KAuCl4) (2 mole AuOH3/ 2 mole KAuCl4) (247.991 g AuOH3/ 1 mole AuOH3) = 13.125 g

So Actual over theo gives 80.45%
As any of that correct?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I thought my question here was valid. Read the forum rules, I showed my work, yet no response. I am somewhat puzzled why I received no response. Could someone explain where my question became unreasonable?

Thanks
 
Your question was not unreasonable and you showed good effort. It just may be that no one could offer any help yet.

MichaelXY said:
13NaCO3 +2KAuCl4+3H20----> 2Au(OH)3 +2KCL+CO2 +6NACl

My first problem was that I do not see how we went from CO3 to CO2, second since CO3 and CO2 are polyatomics, how do we balance.



Na2CO3 is the correct formula and the equation is not balanced and CO2 is not a polyatomic -it is a compound

The decomposition of CO32- is likely due to the acid character of Au3+ (high charge but kind of a big ion) --> Au3+(H2O)6 --> H+ + Au(H2O)5(OH)2+

The H+ then would react with the CO32- and decompose to H2O and CO2.

For the stoichiometry, the smaller no. of moles of reactant does not make it the limiting reactant -
- Use each mol value and determine how many mol of product can be produced.
- How can this information be used to determine which one is the limiting reactant?
 
Thanks for your help. Much appreciated :)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
8K
Back
Top