Stokes' law and falling sphere method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct application of Stokes' law and the falling sphere method to calculate fluid viscosity. It highlights that the steel balls may not be falling at terminal velocity, which complicates the measurements and results. The flow around the balls is likely not laminar, violating assumptions necessary for Stokes' law. Participants emphasize the importance of sharing experimental results for better analysis and suggest examining the data for transient velocity effects. The need for precise measurements and conditions is critical to achieving consistent viscosity calculations across different ball diameters.
xenoidmaster
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I need help at calculating the viscosity of a fluid. I did an experiment of dropping spherical steel balls through a liquid. The diameter includes 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 20 mm. What makes me confuse is that the viscocity is difference for each diamater, isnt it suppose to be the same? viscocitty shouldnt be affected by diameter of the balls. As i know only terminal velocity will be affected. And so how to calculate the viscocity of the liquid, to get similar answers/small difference between each diameter.
Relevant Equations
η = 2gr^2(d'– d)/9v
where:
v is the particles' terminal velocity velocity (m/s),
r is the radius of the sphere,
g is the gravitational acceleration,
d' is the density of the falling sphere,
d is the density of the liquid,
and η is the viscosity.
In dire need of help, someone please explain the correct method for this, if its not possible what should i write in the conclusion for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You say you did an experiment. What did you measure? Did you plot your results to see if the viscosity is (or is not) constant?
 
Did you loose your last thread on the topic?

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/viscosity-by-falling-sphere-equations.1058374/#post-6978437

Your ball is not falling through the liquid (water) at terminal velocity. You have a transient (time varying) velocity to contend with (in your measurements). By solving (with help if necessary) the ODE for position vs time in the other thread you can examine what the data would "look like" if the conditions were actually met in the experiment. It is almost certain (steel ball falling in water) that the flow around the ball is not laminar. This is (likely) an unmet requirement for the equation wish to use.

You need to post the results of the experiments so it can be discussed.
 
Last edited:
xenoidmaster said:
Homework Statement: I need help at calculating the viscosity of a fluid. I did an experiment of dropping spherical steel balls through a liquid. The diameter includes 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 20 mm. What makes me confuse is that the viscocity is difference for each diamater, isnt it suppose to be the same? viscocitty shouldnt be affected by diameter of the balls. As i know only terminal velocity will be affected. And so how to calculate the viscocity of the liquid, to get similar answers/small difference between each diameter.
Relevant Equations: η = 2gr^2(d'– d)/9v
where:
v is the particles' terminal velocity velocity (m/s),
r is the radius of the sphere,
g is the gravitational acceleration,
d' is the density of the falling sphere,
d is the density of the liquid,
and η is the viscosity.

In dire need of help, someone please explain the correct method for this, if its not possible what should i write in the conclusion for this?
Let's see your calculations. How far from the walls of the container were the balls?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top