Stoke's Theorem around a closed circle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Stokes' Theorem to calculate the line integral of the vector function f = yi - xj + zk around a closed circle of radius R centered at the origin. Participants are exploring the implications of the theorem in relation to the integral over a closed path.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of the original poster's assertion that the integral should be zero, suggesting that the function is not conservative. Others discuss the correct application of Stokes' Theorem and its relationship to Green's Theorem in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing clarifications about the definitions and applications of Stokes' Theorem and the fundamental theorem of calculus. There is a recognition of differing interpretations regarding the nature of the vector field involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the circle being in the x-y plane, which may influence the application of theorems discussed. Some participants express uncertainty about the assumptions made regarding the vector field's properties.

ejs12006
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the line Integral of the function f = yi-xj+zk (where i,j,k, are cartesian unit vectors) around a circle with radius R centered at the origin?

Homework Equations



Stokes Theorem: i.e. the integreal of some function between a and b is equal to the difference in the values of the antiderivitive of that function evaluated at a and b.

The Attempt at a Solution



As I understand it, the answer should be zero; since the integral is over a closed circle (and since it is a continuous function with no sigularities). In this case, a=b, so the antiderivitive of f at a minus the anti-derivative of f at b = 0.

antiderivitive of f: F= .5(y^2)i-.5(x^2)j+.5(z^2)k

Limits of integration: a=b

Apply Stokes Theorem:F(a)-F(b) =0

However, apparently the answer is 2*pi*(R^2) (the area of a circle). No explenation is given except that stokes theorem should be used . Any Ideas? I am almost certain there is an error in the solutiuons, but I would appreciate a second opinion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you integrate in a clockwise direction or the usual anti-clockwise manner?
If the questions asks you to do it clockwise then I found the answer to be 2*pi*(R^2).

---
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NO NO NO

Help stamp out this error. You refer to a theorem by somebody called Stoke. That is NOT what you want. The poor man's name was Stokes. Sir George Stokes. So...

correct: Stokes' Theorem ... or ... Stokes's Theorem

incorrect: Stoke's Theorem

Give Sir George his due!
 
What you state as Stoke's theorem is NOT- it is just the fundamental theorem of Calculus.

The Stokes' theorem as given in Calculus is
\oint_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}= \int\int_S \nabla\times \vec{F} d\vec{S}
where C is the boundary of the surface S.

What is sometimes called Stokes' theorem in advanced itexematics, or the "generalized" Stokes' theorem is
\int_{d\sigma} \omega= \int_\sigma d\omega
where \sigma is a simply connected manifold with boundary d\sigma and \omega is a differential form with differential d\omega.

Since this is in 3 dimensions, there are an infinite number of "circle with radius R centered at the origin". Is any information given as to which is intended?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The circle is in the x-y plane, Sorry about that.

Ok it makes sense that what I've written above is just the fundamental theorem of calculus, but shouldn't it still apply? i.e. the answer of 0 is still valid?
 
OK so I actually did it out and I get the right answer. But if anyone can explain how Stokes' theorem applies here, that would be much appreciated.
 
Well you probably couldn't read what HallsofIvy said because his/her LaTeX wasn't in the form this forum could read.

Stokes' Theorem:

\int\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}=\int(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{F})\cdot d\vec{S}

It says that instead of taking the line integral, you can change it into a flux integral of the curl(F) through the area bounded by the circle or, more generally, a curve C.

Also, the fundamental theorem does not say that F(b) - F(a) = 0. A line integral is 0 only when you integrate through a conservative vector field around a closed path. The field you provided is not conservative, so despite being a closed path, that line integral will not be 0. (To verify that, take the curl of that vector field. It is conservative if and only if the curl(F) is 0, which it is not.)

EDIT: You might want to look up the definition of a conservative vector field. I realized that I brought that up without explaining what it meant. Go to Paul's Online Math Notes. That site has a lot of answers to questions from students in maths ranging from Calcs 1 to 3, DE, and Linear Algebra.
 
Last edited:
Because this circle is in the xy-plane, z= 0 and "Stokes' Theorem" reduces to "Green's Theorem" applied to the function y\vec{i}- x\vec{j}.

Greens theorem says
\oint P(x,y)dx+ Q(x,y)dy= \int\int \left(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}- \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\right) dxdy.

For this problem, P(x,y)= y and Q(x,y)= -x so the integral on the right is just -2 times the area of the circle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K