I Stopping power for a proton ion gun through a Boron-11 sheet 1mm thick

Javier Lopez
Messages
74
Reaction score
3
Hello, I need the stopping power for a proton ion gun through Boron-11 sheet 1mm thick.

I have the following table obtained from here:
https://www-nds.iaea.org/stopping/stopping_hydr.html
Where the unit is in 1-15*eV*cm2/atom:
2q24z6r.jpg


Then I calculated for 600keV protons at table 5.1eV*cm2/atom.
I calculated for Boron which density is 2080kg/m3 and atomic number 11 a density of 1.139atoms/m3
So the stopping power should be:
5.1*1e-6 (MeV/eV) * 1e-4 (cm2/m2) /1.1389 *.001=58e6 MeV

That is too much (at least 1e6 times), what I did wrong?
 

Attachments

  • 2q24z6r.jpg
    2q24z6r.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 1,098
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not 5.1 eV cm2/atom, it is 5.1x10-15 eV cm2/atom.
It is not 1.139 atoms/m3 (that's a bloody big atom!) What is it?
It is not 1e-4 cm2/m2
Where does 0.001 come from?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I am very sorry, I am surprised about lot errors I made yesterday late ( I have to sleep sometimes),
I introducted in the formula 5.1e-15.
The target density was 1.139e29 atoms/m3 (Boron 11 density is 2080kg/m3 so 2080/11amus/1.660538921E-27 kg/amu = 1.139e29)
The 1e-4 is Ok but I had to write 1e-4 (m^2/cm^2)
0.001 was the target thick that I forgot to advise (1mm)
At the end I obtain:
5.1e-15 (eV*cm2/atom)*1e-6 (MeV/eV) * 1e-4 (m2/cm2) *1.1389 e29 (atom/m3) * 1e-3 mm=58 MeV, that is 50% over other calculus I made but more reasonable

If somebody want to calculate the stopping power I should recommend (moreover not follow my calculus) to obtain data from tables at this site:
https://www-nds.iaea.org/stopping/stopping_hydr.html

Also this link could help:
https://www-nds.iaea.org/stopping/

Thanks to Helmut, I will never forget him
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top