Straight Line Case. My paradox. Sorry if I rewrite and start a new post.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving a fast-moving train and the implications of special relativity on simultaneity and causality. Participants explore the scenario where a bullet is fired from the train towards an observer, A, while a laser is shot to intercept the bullet. The focus is on the differing outcomes based on the reference frames of A and the train's occupants (B, C, and D).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that in A's frame, the bullet reaches A before the laser can intercept it, suggesting A would die.
  • Others argue that in the train's frame, the laser and bullet can be coordinated such that A is saved.
  • A participant questions the specification of the bullet's speed and its implications on the perceived paradox, emphasizing the need for clarity in reference frames.
  • Another participant suggests that applying Lorentz transformations could resolve the paradox by providing a consistent description across frames.
  • There are discussions about the angles and timing of the laser's shot in relation to the bullet's trajectory, indicating a complex interplay of frames and directions.
  • Some participants express a desire for numerical calculations to clarify the situation and demonstrate the absence of a paradox.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of analyzing the problem in a single reference frame to avoid confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether A will die or be saved, as the outcomes depend heavily on the chosen reference frame and the assumptions made regarding the speeds and directions of the bullet and laser. Multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of simultaneity and causality in this scenario.

Contextual Notes

There are unspecified features in the scenario, such as the exact directions of the bullet and laser in different frames, and the need for precise equations of motion for all involved parties. The discussion highlights the complexities of relativistic effects and the importance of clearly defining parameters in thought experiments.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying special relativity, particularly in understanding the implications of simultaneity and causality in different reference frames, as well as those engaged in thought experiments in physics.

ppppppp
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
1. Suppose, a fast moving train (600,000 km long) running on straight line at speed 0.999c, perpendicular to A.
2. A is at point P. B stands in center of train. M point. Distance P to M is 300,000 km. C stands at end of train. D stands in head of train.
3. Now B flash light. According to B, the light reaches C, D same time, in one second in their reference frame. According to A, the light reaches C first, then 22 seconds later in A’s reference frame, reaches D.
4. Now suppose, as soon as light reaches C (now C shall be at M point), C shoot a super fast bullet, at speed 30,000 km per second, at A. D shoots a laser beam to destroy C's bullet as soon as light reaches D.

Now I ask, will A die or not? According to A's reference frame, he is dead. Because the bullet travel time travel from C to A is only 10 seconds, D's laser is fired 22 seconds later, too late to save A.
But according to B , C, or D, A is saved. Because when light reaches C, D at same time, D's laser takes just a bit over 2 seconds to intercept the bullet. (just a bit over 2 seconds is very simple geometry).

Please find out the problem or solve this of my paradox.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ppppppp said:
1. Suppose, a fast moving train (600,000 km long) running on straight line at speed 0.999c, perpendicular to A.
2. A is at point P. B stands in center of train. M point. Distance P to M is 300,000 km. C stands at end of train. D stands in head of train.
3. Now B flash light. According to B, the light reaches C, D same time, in one second in their reference frame. According to A, the light reaches C first, then 22 seconds later in A’s reference frame, reaches D.
4. Now suppose, as soon as light reaches C (now C shall be at M point), C shoot a super fast bullet, at speed 30,000 km per second, at A. D shoots a laser beam to destroy C's bullet as soon as light reaches D.

Now I ask, will A die or not? According to A's reference frame, he is dead. Because the bullet travel time travel from C to A is only 10 seconds, D's laser is fired 22 seconds later, too late to save A.
But according to B , C, or D, A is saved. Because when light reaches C, D at same time, D's laser takes just a bit over 2 seconds to intercept the bullet. (just a bit over 2 seconds is very simple geometry).

Please find out the problem or solve this of my paradox.

You may not realize it, but there are still many features of your scenario that are not specified. Doing so might nudge you to solving the pseudo-paradox. Picking one ambiguity at random, in whose frame is the speed of the bullet specified? It will be very different in A's frame versus the train frame, and the difference will not be determined by vector addition as in non-relativistic mechanics. Further, this difference has a lot to do with the apparent paradox. You should also realize the directions of bullet and laser are different for the two frames.
 
Thanks for attention. I would say, bullet speed in A's frame.
 
Last edited:
ppppppp said:
Thanks for attention. I would say, bullet speed in A's frame. Laser also in A's frame.

Next question: In A's frame you propose bullet kill's A before D shoots laser. In what direction (in A's frame) does D fire the laser? As I said, you have many unspecified features.

Step back: If you have a complete description in A's frame, then apply Lorentz transform, you will have complete description in BCD frame. By Lorentz invariance of physical laws, all physical facts will be the same in B frame (distances, times, order of non-causally connected events will be different; but order of causally connected events, and what collides with what, will be the same). This is what Dalespam has been encouraging you to do. It requires only algebra. No one else can do it for you because you have not actually specified a problem (though you think you have). The exercise of working it out will lead you to the conclusion that there is no paradox.
 
D fires towards the bullet in D's frame (that can be calculated with a slight angle 5.7391705041579 (out of 360) degree downwards , tang=0.100503782, so it takes a 2.010075631 seconds to intercept the bullet in D's frame.)

please give numbers and math to show it is NOT paradox. I need see numbers or math! Thanks ahead!
 
ppppppp said:
1. Suppose, a fast moving train (600,000 km long) running on straight line at speed 0.999c, perpendicular to A.

Yes! Solve it as PAllen said. I am interested in knowing the result. Use space-time diagram and let me and others know.
 
ppppppp said:
D fires towards the bullet in D's frame (that can be calculated with a slight angle 5.7391705041579 (out of 360) degree downwards , tang=0.100503782, so it takes a 2.010075631 seconds to intercept the bullet in D's frame.)

please give numbers and math to show it is NOT paradox. I need see numbers or math! Thanks ahead!

Ok, so laser information given in D frame, bullet in A frame. Translate A frame information to train frame. In that frame, A is moving .999c in direction from D to C. Bullet is moving almost horizontally (*not* vertically) in the DC direction at slightly more than .999c. The laser at your specified angle won't come anywhere near the bullet.

You are mixing up frames all over the place. It would be simpler to describe everything precisely in one frame.
 
thanks, i get your point.
 
If you want help analyzing the problem I would be glad to help, but you have to work through it yourself if you want to really understand. Since you have specified the bullet speed in A's frame, the best approach will be to examine the problem in complete detail in the A frame. The first step is to specify the equations of motion for A, B, C, and D. For example:
[tex](x_B(t),y_B(t))=(.99 t, 0)[/tex]
[tex](x_A(t),y_A(t))=(0, 1)[/tex]
Where distance is measured in light-seconds and time is measured in seconds.

The next steps are to specify the equations of motion for C and D. After that, write the equation for the spacetime interval between an arbitrary point on C's worldline and the light flash, set that equal to 0 and solve for when the light flash reaches C. Repeat for D. Then you need to write the equation of motion for the bullet from C. Once you have that you determine if A lives by writing the expression for the spacetime interval between the flash arriving at D and the worldline of the bullet, set that equal to 0 and try to solve. If there is a solution then A lives, otherwise A dies.

Then, you simply transform everything to the train frame to get the story there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K