B Strapped to a quadcopter in zero gravity

AI Thread Summary
In a zero-gravity environment, a quadcopter could theoretically be flown by a pilot strapped to it, relying on inertial forces and visual cues for navigation. The thrust vector of the quadcopter would always be normal to the propeller plane, allowing for control through yaw, throttle, pitch, and roll. However, without thrust, the quadcopter would simply float, making stability a significant challenge. Adjustable pitch propellers and potentially rewritten control software would be necessary to manage flight dynamics effectively. Overall, flying a quadcopter in such conditions could be feasible but would differ greatly from traditional flight in gravity.
bland
Messages
149
Reaction score
44
I was wondering... imagine a large enclosed space sealed off in intergalactic space, filled with air at normal sea level pressure. I was further wondering with regard to a quadcopter's symmetrical x and y-axis and the fact of the thrust vector always being normal to the plane of the props, that a person was securely strapped to this quadcopter and that it had a decent thrust to weight and was controlled by the pilot with a normal gimbal controller, with yaw and throttle and pitch and roll.

I was pondering that without any thrust it would just float around otherwise the person strapped to the body of the aircraft at the centre of gravity would feel the inertial force of acceleration and so would that pilot be able to fly around accurately merely by relying on the inertial forces they were feeling, assuming there were also plenty of visual cues in the 3 dimensional space in a gravity free zone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Will your quadcopter have adjustable pitch propellers? If so, over what range of adjustment angle? Why do I ask this? :wink:
 
I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to fly in such a situation. The control would be very different from flying in gravity though, and the software controlling it would probably need to be rewritten.
 
It would all be very unstable and the rotors would need to be reversible or the pilot would need a 4pi range for the gimbal mount.
Could it possibly be more stable than a vectored jet pack?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top