Does carbonation cause straws to float in water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy Water
AI Thread Summary
Carbonation in beverages like Coke can cause straws to float due to the formation of bubbles. When the straw is placed in the carbonated drink, bubbles may attach to its surface, creating enough upward force to lift it. In contrast, a straw in still water does not experience this effect and remains at the bottom. The phenomenon is primarily attributed to the interaction between the bubbles and the straw, rather than surface tension alone. Understanding this can clarify why straws behave differently in carbonated versus non-carbonated liquids.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
So when i go to a restaurant and order a coke with no ice and the waitress brings it back with a straw in it the straw never stays in the glass. When i get it the straw is resting on the edge of the glass with the end barely in the coke, my guess is that it is held up with surface tension. But when I try to put the straw back in the glass normally it slowly starts to rise back up. But if the straw is just in water it will stay put at the bottom of the glass. So is it possible that some of the carbonation is bubbling up and hitting the straw making it go up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the bubbles attaching themselves to the side of the straw and growing.
 
thanks for your answer, That makes sense
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top