Stress/strain tensor for anisotropic materials

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on understanding the stress and strain tensors for anisotropic materials, specifically focusing on the application of Einstein's notation in the context of stiffness and compliance matrices for monoclinic and orthotropic materials. Participants express confusion regarding the notation and seek clarification on how these matrices are reduced in different material contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about Einstein's notation and its application in three-dimensional anisotropic materials.
  • There is a mention of starting with a stack of unidirectional materials before moving to bi-directional materials.
  • One participant attempts to define the Einstein summation convention but is met with a correction regarding its proper definition and application.
  • Another participant notes that for orthotropic materials, the compliance/stiffness matrix reduces to 21 constants, seeking further explanation on this reduction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the understanding of Einstein's summation convention, with some providing definitions that are challenged by others. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the clarity of the notation and its implications for material properties.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the participants' understanding of the Einstein summation convention, and the discussion reveals a dependence on definitions that are not fully agreed upon. The scope of the discussion is also restricted to specific material types (monoclinic and orthotropic) without broader context.

chiraganand
Messages
111
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I understand stress, strain but when it moves on to 3 dimension anisotropic materials using tensors and stiffness matrices I get confused with einstein's notation. can someone please help me out in this regard to undrstand how stiffness and compliance matrices get reduced for monoclinic, orthotropic materials?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
chiraganand said:
Hi,

I understand stress, strain but when it moves on to 3 dimension anisotropic materials using tensors and stiffness matrices I get confused with einstein's notation. can someone please help me out in this regard to undrstand how stiffness and compliance matrices get reduced for monoclinic, orthotropic materials?
Are you trying to do it for a stack of uni's?
 
i wan to start off with a stack of uni's and then move on to bi-directionals. The main problem is i am unable to visualise einstein's notation and to differentiate when it is that and when it is not.
 
chiraganand said:
i wan to start off with a stack of uni's and then move on to bi-directionals. The main problem is i am unable to visualise einstein's notation and to differentiate when it is that and when it is not.
This is einstein's summation convention?
 
Chestermiller said:
This is einstein's summation convention?
yep..
 
Please tell us what your understanding of the einstein summation convention is so that we can better pinpoint what your difficulty is.
 
Chestermiller said:
Please tell us what your understanding of the einstein summation convention is so that we can better pinpoint what your difficulty is.
Ok einstein summation is that for when an index is being repeated in the forumlation for example a11+a12/SUB]+a13+a14 then it can be written as aij j=1,2,3 and also for orthotropic materials the compliance/stiffness matrix reduces to 21 constants. Can someone please explain how??
 
Last edited:
chiraganand said:
Ok einstein summation is that for when an index is being repeated in the forumlation for example a11+a12/SUB]+a13+a14 then it can be written as aij j=1,2,3 and also for orthotropic materials the compliance/stiffness matrix reduces to 21 constants. Can someone please explain how??
That's not the Einstein summation convention. The Einstein convention says that, if an index is repeated in an expression, summation over that index is implied. It's the same as if you had a summation sign in front of the expression. The Einstein summation convention is typically used in stress-strain contexts to concisely represent matrix multiplication (without having to include the summation sign). An example is aijbjk.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K