String theory in dimensions other than 10

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around non-critical string theory, specifically addressing questions about Gepner models, the construction of non-critical string theories with solvable conformal field theories (CFTs), and the relationship between non-critical and critical string theories in lower dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire whether Gepner models are a subset of non-critical string theory, with one suggesting that Gepner models with central charge not equal to 9 may be considered non-critical.
  • There is a proposal that if a CFT is a minimal model, then it can lead to a completely solvable non-critical string theory, referencing past investigations into this area.
  • One participant questions whether an equivalent description of a non-critical string theory in lower dimensions can be achieved through compactification of a critical string theory, noting the differences in the behavior of the Liouville mode and the implications of the Virasoro anomaly.
  • A clarification is sought regarding the nature of the Virasoro anomaly, specifically whether it refers to the trace anomaly of the stress tensor, with participants agreeing on this point.
  • References to introductory lectures and reviews on non-critical string theories are provided, particularly focusing on dimensions less than one.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of Gepner models and the implications of anomalies in non-critical string theories. There is no consensus on the equivalence of non-critical and critical string theories in lower dimensions, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of the anomalies involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the relationship between critical and non-critical string theories, particularly regarding the behavior of anomalies and the conditions under which certain models are solvable. The discussion reflects ongoing uncertainties and differing interpretations of the theoretical framework.

crackjack
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
I have a few questions on non-critical string theory...

terminology:
1: Are "Gepner models" a subset of non-critical string theory?

technical:
2: Given a set of spectrum, are there ways to construct a non-critical string theory with enough symmetries so that the CFT becomes minimal and hence completely solvable?
3: Given a non-critical string theory (say, in d-dimensions with d<10) can one come up with an equivalent (in all sense of the word) description in terms of some compactified (to the same d-dimensions) critical string theory?

May be some introductory lecture(s) with references citing original work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can answer those...

crackjack said:
1: Are "Gepner models" a subset of non-critical string theory?
Yes and no... Gepner models refers to constructions where the internal CFT is represented by combinations of (superconformal) minimal models. If the total central charge c-hat equals 9, then this will yield a critical string theory, otherwise not.


crackjack said:
Given a set of spectrum, are there ways to construct a non-critical string theory with enough symmetries so that the CFT becomes minimal and hence completely solvable?
Yes - if the CFT is minimal model, then the theory is completely solvable, as it can be represented by a matrix model and is governed by integrable systems. This has been heavily investigated around 1990.

crackjack said:
Given a non-critical string theory (say, in d-dimensions with d<10) can one come up with an equivalent (in all sense of the word) description in terms of some compactified (to the same d-dimensions) critical string theory?
Along the lines of thought discussed so far, not that I would know of. In non-critical strings, due to the non-cancellation of the Virasoro anomaly, the Liouville mode of the 2d metric becomes dynamical (ie, does not decouple). This is very different from any critical string theory.

But there are other notions of non-critical strings, like the strongly coupled theory in 6d, but those are constructed differently; they are not obtained from a world-sheet CFT but from decoupling limits of critical strings.


crackjack said:
May be some introductory lecture(s) with references citing original work?

This is a good review about d<1 strings:
http://www-spires.dur.ac.uk/cgi-bin/spiface/hep/www?r=PUPT-1217
See also e.g
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9110041
 
Last edited by a moderator:
suprised said:
Yes and no... Gepner models refers to constructions where the internal CFT is represented by combinations of (superconformal) minimal models. If the total central charge c-hat equals 9, then this will yield a critical string theory, otherwise not.
I will take it as "Gepner models with c \neq 9 are subsets of non-critical string theories"

suprised said:
In non-critical strings, due to the non-cancellation of the Virasoro anomaly, the Liouville mode of the 2d metric becomes dynamical (ie, does not decouple). This is very different from any critical string theory.
A clarification: Are you referring to the trace anomaly of stress tensor, when you say Virasoro anomaly?
Asking this because I thought the other anomaly (Weyl) is canceled in both critical & non-critical strings. In addition, cancellation of Weyl anomaly automatically cancels the trace anomaly in critical strings. Seems like this automatic cancellation does not hold for non-critical strings?

suprised said:
Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
crackjack said:
I will take it as "Gepner models with c \neq 9 are subsets of non-critical string theories"
yes.

crackjack said:
A clarification: Are you referring to the trace anomaly of stress tensor, when you say Virasoro anomaly?
yes!

Happy Holidays!
 
Thanks surprised, and wish you a very good year ahead!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K