String Theory -- what is the current status?

AI Thread Summary
String theory remains largely unchanged in its status over the past few decades, characterized by its mathematical elegance but lacking substantial physical results. Experts like Edward Witten maintain optimism about its potential, despite the theory's historical challenges in yielding meaningful predictions. Lee Smolin highlights persistent issues, such as unresolved constants and arbitrary dimensions, which complicate the theory's development. The discussion raises questions about the flexibility of string theory, suggesting that creating alternative theories like "ball theory" or "spiral theory" might be relatively straightforward. Overall, string theory continues to be a promising yet elusive area of research in theoretical physics.
MMS
Messages
146
Reaction score
4
Hi guys,

To the experts of particle physics and of course to anyone else who knows and wants to share, what is the current status of string theory? Is there any progress? regress? are we stuck at a point (if so, I'd love to know which and why)?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
String theory is pretty much where it has been for 30 or 40 years ... mathematically elegant and showing great promise but the promise never seems to turn into anything.

There was another thread on this today linking to an interview w/ Whitten. He was optimistic about string theory 25 years ago and he is optimistic about it today, and if he lives another 25 years he'll probably still be optimistic that some day it's going to produce results that are meaningful in physics rather than just in math.
 
  • Like
Likes MMS and Puma
Smolin points out in 'the trouble with physics' that there are 7 constants which never quite settle down, an arbitrary number of dimensions, and (maybe) a special force which keeps the ends of the strings apart (?) Anyhow my question is how easy would it be to create 'ball theory', 'spiral theory' and so forth with such a huge amount of flexibily? My laymans answer - easy peasy, but would like to hear from an expert.
 
  • Like
Likes MMS
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top