Struggling with Fourier Transform in Math Methods Class

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around challenges faced in understanding Fourier Transforms within a math methods class, particularly in relation to a specific problem involving the Dirac delta function and its properties. Participants express their struggles with the concepts and the application of these transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the properties of the Dirac delta function and its Fourier Transform, questioning how to manipulate certain expressions involving the delta function and other mathematical components. There is an exploration of the relationship between the Heaviside step function and the delta function.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights and potential connections between concepts, while others are still grappling with the implications of these ideas. There is a sense of collaborative exploration, with no clear consensus yet on the resolution of the problem.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes a lack of prior knowledge in differential equations, which may be impacting their understanding of the material. The discussion also touches on the relevance of the Heaviside step function beyond the immediate problem.

rdfloyd
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I haven't had differential equations yet, so I am struggling in your math methods class. I understand what a Fourier Transform is, but I'm having trouble with this particular problem.

Homework Statement


Here's a screenshot. Better than I can write it.

http://i.imgur.com/PQ6tB.png

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I did:

http://i.imgur.com/JuUzu.jpg

The capital letters have already been transformed, so if I take the inverse transformation, I should end up with what I had to begin with.

Where I get stuck is with the [itex]Q, \frac{1}{D}, \frac{1}{(w^{2}+k^{2})}[/itex]. Is it possible to split the [itex]\Delta[w][/itex] up from the fraction, because that would just be back to [itex]\delta[x][/itex].

If I'm completely wrong and beyond hope, just tell me and I will go cry in a corner.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh hey, I think the issue may be that ##\delta[x]## is actually the dirac delta function, which has the property that
$$
\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)\delta(x)\, \mathrm{d}x = f(0)
$$
This would mean that
$$
\mathbb{F}[Q\delta(x)]=Q
$$
See if this fixes things. I tried the problem and still had a good deal of trouble with it :confused:, but you may be able to swing the rest from there.

PS: I'd be interested to see the rest of your solution when you get it. I suspect it may have to do with absolute values and or the step function.
 
Using what you said (which makes sense; can't believe I didn't see that), I got this:

http://i.imgur.com/lBkuj.jpg

There were absolute values, however, I omitted them because I didn't think they were necessary.
 
Hmmm...
You know how ##|x|## has slope -1 until ##x=0##, and then it has slope 1? I think you might be able to make this claim:
$$
\frac{\mathrm{d}|x|}{\mathrm{d}x}=2\mathbb{H}(x)-1\text{, where H is the Heaviside step function. Note also that}\\
\frac{\mathrm{d}\mathbb{H}}{\mathrm{d}x}=\delta(x)
$$
I have a suspicion this might be somehow related. I still haven't figured it out, but now it's starting to bother me.
 
That's the first time I've heard of the Heaviside. What are it's uses (not only to this problem)?
 
I don't know! In fact, I don't even know why or where I heard of it! But check this page out, it's pretty cool: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HeavisideStepFunction.html
I guess if you wanted to, you could also represent the T=0 Fermi distribution using the Heaviside... Not sure that would actually be useful, though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K