Stuck on a Tricky Integral: What Works Best?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter xAxis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a challenging integral of the form ∫ dx/(x * sqrt((x^2) + k)). Participants explore various substitution methods and transformations in an attempt to simplify and solve the integral, sharing their approaches and results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially attempts the substitution x^2 + k = t but expresses uncertainty about the resulting integral 1/2 ∫ dt/((t-k)sqrt(t)).
  • Another participant suggests the substitution x = k^{1/2}tan(y) as an alternative approach.
  • A different substitution x = k^{1/2}sinh(t) is proposed, leading to the integral ∫ dt/sinh(t).
  • Concerns are raised about the correctness of the transformations, with one participant requesting clarification on the steps taken to arrive at ∫ dt/sinh(t).
  • Participants discuss the manipulation of the integral, with one noting that the expression under the root in the denominator was mismanaged and should include a factor of x.
  • Another participant mentions that 1/sech(t) = csch(t) and suggests looking up the integral in a table or using a known identity for simplification.
  • One participant shares that they used an online integrator to find the solution ln(tanh(t/2)) after trying various substitutions.
  • Another substitution x^2 + 1 = p^2 is mentioned as leading to a result, though details are not fully elaborated.
  • Participants discuss the utility of different online tools for integration, comparing their capabilities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the best method to solve the integral, as multiple substitution approaches are proposed, and participants express differing opinions on the correctness of each other's transformations and results.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their manipulations and the resulting integrals, indicating that assumptions made during substitutions may not hold universally. The discussion includes various mathematical identities and transformations that are not fully resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in integral calculus, particularly those facing challenges with substitution methods and integral transformations, may find this discussion relevant.

xAxis
Messages
223
Reaction score
4
I came to this integral which I thaught would be easy to solve, but I'm stuck.

int dx/{x *sqrt{(x ^ 2 )+ k}}
(Sorry I am trying to get it in Latex)

I tried substitution:
[tex]x ^ 2 + k = t[/tex]
as I remembered from the book (years ago)

But have ended with this:
1/2 times
int dt/{(t-k)sqrt(t)}

Im not sure if this leads to a solution. Any help would be appreciated
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try the substitution x=k1/2tan(y)
 
Thanks d leet. Sorry I tried in Latex and kept getting most unusual expressions. This is the correct expression.
 
Try the substitution x=k^{1/2} sinh t.

Daniel.
 
that substitution led me to
int dt/sinh t
Any idea how this could be solved?
 
xAxis said:
that substitution led me to
int dt/sinh t
Any idea how this could be solved?

It shouldn't lead you to that, can you show the work you did using that substitution?
 
Sure if you don't mind my ascii typing :)
dx = (sqrt)k cosht dt
I = (sqrt)k*int cosht*dt/((sqrt)k*sinht*(sqrt)(k(sinh^2t + 1))) =

=(sqrt)k*int cosht*dt/((sqrt)k*sinht*(sqrt)(k*cosh^2t)) =

==(sqrt)k*int cosht*dt/(k*sinht*cosht)

Then after canceling cosht and puting 1/k out, I am left with dt/sinht
 
xAxis said:
Sure if you don't mind my ascii typing :)
dx = (sqrt)k cosht dt
I = (sqrt)k*int cosht*dt/((sqrt)k*sinht*(sqrt)(k(sinh^2t + 1))) =

This line is almost impossible to follow, but it doesn't look correct at all. you should have k.5*cosht/(ksinh2 + k).5 inside of the integral.
 
I got the same under the root of the denominator. When you factor out k, u got (k(sinh^2 + 1))^.5 But that's only the root. There was an x multilplying that root.
I think I reduced it properly, but don't know how to solve dt/sinht
 
  • #10
xAxis said:
I got the same under the root of the denominator. When you factor out k, u got (k(sinh^2 + 1))^.5 But that's only the root. There was an x multilplying that root.
I think I reduced it properly, but don't know how to solve dt/sinht

Sorry about that I didn't see the factor of x in the denominator. Well isn't 1/sech(t)= csch(t)? and I think you can look that up in a table of integrals, or I;m sure there's a way to do it, but I'm not sure how do it since I never have before.
 
  • #11
xAxis said:
that substitution led me to
int dt/sinh t
Any idea how this could be solved?

Yes, just multiply both the denominator and the numerator by #sinh t# and then use the ch^2 -sh^2 =1 identity.

Daniel.
 
  • #12
Thanks dextercioby, your first tip was good as I managed to reduce to the above. As I didn't find it in tables, I used an excelent web integrator
http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp
The solution is ln(tanh(t/2))
 
  • #13
There's also the substitution

[tex]x^{2}+1 =p^{2}[/tex]

that leads immediately to a result.

Daniel.
 
  • #14
xAxis said:
Thanks dextercioby, your first tip was good as I managed to reduce to the above. As I didn't find it in tables, I used an excelent web integrator
http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp
The solution is ln(tanh(t/2))

www.quickmath.com is an excellent alternative website for indefinite/definite integration, derivatives, plots, solving equations, matricies, etc.
 
  • #15
I agree quickmath can perform complicated definite integrals, while Mathematica's web integrator can't.

Daniel.
 
  • #16
dextercioby said:
Yes, just multiply both the denominator and the numerator by #sinh t# and then use the ch^2 -sh^2 =1 identity.

Daniel.

Alternatively, use a u=tanh(t/2) substitution for the fun of it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K