Study After Schwarzschild Spacetime: What's Next?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the next steps for someone who has completed the fundamentals of Schwarzschild spacetime in General Relativity. Participants explore various topics and resources for further study, including textbooks and specific spacetime solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest studying Hartle’s textbook as a suitable next step for understanding General Relativity.
  • Others propose that after Schwarzschild, the next natural topics to study are Kerr spacetime and FRW spacetime, although the order of study is debated.
  • A participant mentions the challenge of textbooks not providing solutions, which complicates self-verification of problem-solving efforts.
  • Another participant shares an anecdote about an author's reasoning for not including solutions, emphasizing the learning process through problem-solving.
  • Concerns are raised about the subjective nature of "really understanding" the material, with references to personal experiences with challenging exercises.
  • Some participants argue that working through related problems can reveal gaps in understanding, while others caution that simply being told answers does not enhance comprehension.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement on the value of studying specific textbooks and spacetime solutions, but there is no consensus on the order of study or the best approach to verifying understanding through problem-solving.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in textbook resources, particularly regarding the absence of solutions for exercises, which may hinder self-assessment of understanding.

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
For someone who have just finished the study of the (fundamentals) of Schwarzschild spacetime, what would be the next natural topic to study?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends... what is your goal here?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: martinbn
Nugatory said:
Depends... what is your goal here?
To be able to tell friends that I know all of the fundamentals of General Relativity :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
Study Hartle’s textbook. I actually don’t have it, but many sources say it is by far the most accessible text, suitable for second or third year undergrads, focusing on the physics first.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and kent davidge
If you're interested in understanding particular solutions of interest, the obvious next ones after Schwarzschild would be Kerr spacetime and FRW spacetime.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: martinbn, PhDeezNutz and kent davidge
PeterDonis said:
Kerr spacetime and FRW spacetime
In this order?
 
kent davidge said:
To be able to tell friends that I know all of the fundamentals of General Relativity :)
PAllen said:
Study Hartle’s textbook.

Yes, systematically study a textbook like Hartle or Moore, and work half the problems.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
George Jones said:
Yes, systematically study a textbook like Hartle or Moore, and work half the problems.
Seconding this, I’ll add @ZapperZ ’s recommendation to keep a notebook of your problem solution efforts. I still have mine from Bergmann’s 1942 textbook, which was the first GR text I studied.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
PAllen said:
I’ll add @ZapperZ ’s recommendation to keep a notebook of your problem solution efforts
The problem is that most textbooks don't give the solutions. So we have no way of checking our attempts.

I once emailed a famous author asking him why they don't give the answers so that we can verify if our solutions are correct, and surprisingly he answered my email. He told me that they want students to learn by attempting to solve the problems, and if they would publish the answers, people tend to read them before they have tried really hard.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #10
kent davidge said:
In this order?

I don't know that it matters that much, but Kerr spacetime is more closely related to Schwarzschild than FRW is, so probably yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
  • #11
kent davidge said:
The problem is that most textbooks don't give the solutions. So we have no way of checking our attempts.

Another answer your famous author might have given (which one professor of mine once gave me) is that once you really understand the material, you won't have to ask if your solution is correct or not; you'll know.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and kent davidge
  • #12
kent davidge said:
The problem is that most textbooks don't give the solutions. So we have no way of checking our attempts.

I once emailed a famous author asking him why they don't give the answers so that we can verify if our solutions are correct, and surprisingly he answered my email. He told me that they want students to learn by attempting to solve the problems, and if they would publish the answers, people tend to read them before they have tried really hard.
In the past that was a real issue. However, now you could post your solutions efforts you have any doubts about here, and people would help you confirm or correct them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and kent davidge
  • #13
kent davidge said:
To be able to tell friends that I know all of the fundamentals of General Relativity :)
You can do that anyway.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
  • #14
PeterDonis said:
once you really understand the material, you won't have to ask if your solution is correct or not;

And what does "really understand" mean? o0) The problem is that sometimes you think you understand, when actually you don't and there is no one there to tell you that. I guess it depends on how hard the exercises are. I have some old russian books on electrodynamics with exercises that some of my faculty proffessors had problems with.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Motore
  • #15
weirdoguy said:
The problem is that sometimes you think you understand, when actually you don't and there is no one there to tell you that.

Yes, but if you keep working other problems related to the same physics, you'll soon find that what you thought you understood, you don't, because you'll get stuck.

The disadvantage of being told the answer, when you weren't able to find it yourself, is that being told does not help your understanding; you'll still be just as stuck on the next problem. That's one reason why we don't give answers in our homework forum (the other is that we don't want to become the Internet's lookup table for homework answers); we only give hints.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K