Study After Schwarzschild Spacetime: What's Next?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
14 replies · 1K views
kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
For someone who have just finished the study of the (fundamentals) of Schwarzschild spacetime, what would be the next natural topic to study?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
Physics news on Phys.org
Nugatory said:
Depends... what is your goal here?
To be able to tell friends that I know all of the fundamentals of General Relativity :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
Study Hartle’s textbook. I actually don’t have it, but many sources say it is by far the most accessible text, suitable for second or third year undergrads, focusing on the physics first.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and kent davidge
If you're interested in understanding particular solutions of interest, the obvious next ones after Schwarzschild would be Kerr spacetime and FRW spacetime.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: martinbn, PhDeezNutz and kent davidge
PeterDonis said:
Kerr spacetime and FRW spacetime
In this order?
 
kent davidge said:
To be able to tell friends that I know all of the fundamentals of General Relativity :)
PAllen said:
Study Hartle’s textbook.

Yes, systematically study a textbook like Hartle or Moore, and work half the problems.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
George Jones said:
Yes, systematically study a textbook like Hartle or Moore, and work half the problems.
Seconding this, I’ll add @ZapperZ ’s recommendation to keep a notebook of your problem solution efforts. I still have mine from Bergmann’s 1942 textbook, which was the first GR text I studied.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
PAllen said:
I’ll add @ZapperZ ’s recommendation to keep a notebook of your problem solution efforts
The problem is that most textbooks don't give the solutions. So we have no way of checking our attempts.

I once emailed a famous author asking him why they don't give the answers so that we can verify if our solutions are correct, and surprisingly he answered my email. He told me that they want students to learn by attempting to solve the problems, and if they would publish the answers, people tend to read them before they have tried really hard.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
kent davidge said:
In this order?

I don't know that it matters that much, but Kerr spacetime is more closely related to Schwarzschild than FRW is, so probably yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
kent davidge said:
The problem is that most textbooks don't give the solutions. So we have no way of checking our attempts.

Another answer your famous author might have given (which one professor of mine once gave me) is that once you really understand the material, you won't have to ask if your solution is correct or not; you'll know.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and kent davidge
kent davidge said:
The problem is that most textbooks don't give the solutions. So we have no way of checking our attempts.

I once emailed a famous author asking him why they don't give the answers so that we can verify if our solutions are correct, and surprisingly he answered my email. He told me that they want students to learn by attempting to solve the problems, and if they would publish the answers, people tend to read them before they have tried really hard.
In the past that was a real issue. However, now you could post your solutions efforts you have any doubts about here, and people would help you confirm or correct them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and kent davidge
kent davidge said:
To be able to tell friends that I know all of the fundamentals of General Relativity :)
You can do that anyway.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
PeterDonis said:
once you really understand the material, you won't have to ask if your solution is correct or not;

And what does "really understand" mean? o0) The problem is that sometimes you think you understand, when actually you don't and there is no one there to tell you that. I guess it depends on how hard the exercises are. I have some old russian books on electrodynamics with exercises that some of my faculty proffessors had problems with.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Motore
weirdoguy said:
The problem is that sometimes you think you understand, when actually you don't and there is no one there to tell you that.

Yes, but if you keep working other problems related to the same physics, you'll soon find that what you thought you understood, you don't, because you'll get stuck.

The disadvantage of being told the answer, when you weren't able to find it yourself, is that being told does not help your understanding; you'll still be just as stuck on the next problem. That's one reason why we don't give answers in our homework forum (the other is that we don't want to become the Internet's lookup table for homework answers); we only give hints.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz