Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the constraints and considerations of submitting a paper draft to arXiv prior to submitting it to Physical Review B (PRB). Participants explore legal implications, editorial perceptions, and licensing options related to preprints.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions whether there are legal constraints regarding posting a paper on arXiv before submission to PRB and expresses concern about potential editorial biases.
- Another participant shares their experience with Phys Rev D, suggesting that PRB's policies would likely be similar and indicates that posting on arXiv is generally accepted.
- A different participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the publisher's policies regarding preprint servers and provides a link to relevant guidelines from APS.
- One contributor states that uploading a preprint to arXiv is not problematic with PRB, advising to update the submission with the correct reference upon publication.
- The original poster inquires about the appropriateness of the license for arXiv submissions, specifically asking if a perpetual, non-exclusive license is suitable.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree that posting on arXiv before submitting to PRB is acceptable, but there are differing opinions on the potential impact on editorial decisions and the specifics of licensing.
Contextual Notes
Some participants reference specific policies and experiences, but there is no consensus on the implications of preprints for publication outcomes or the best licensing choice.